Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650130›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2019

Abdominal wall endometriosis: An 11-year retrospective observational cohort study.

Sandra Marras, Nicola Pluchino, Patrick Petignat, Jean-Marie Wenger, Frédéric Ris, Nicolas C Buchs, Jean Dubuisson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spontaneous abdominal wall endometriosis: A case report.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra MarrasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geneva University Hospitals, 30 Boulevard de la Cluse, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Nicola PluchinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geneva University Hospitals, 30 Boulevard de la Cluse, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Patrick PetignatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geneva University Hospitals, 30 Boulevard de la Cluse, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Jean-Marie WengerFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1 Rue Michel Servet, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Frédéric RisDepartment of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Nicolas C BuchsDepartment of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Jean DubuissonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geneva University Hospitals, 30 Boulevard de la Cluse, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to review the records of patients with excised abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) to determine patient characteristics, diagnostic methods, presence of concurrent pelvic endometriosis and type of surgery. STUDY

designMedical records from an 11-year period were searched to identify histologically confirmed AWE cases. Descriptive data were collected and analyzed. Two subgroups were differentiated: isolated AWE and pelvic endometriosis-associated AWE.

resultsThirty-five women with AWE were included. The most common symptom was cyclic abdominal or parietal pain (68.6%); 17.1% of the women had no symptoms. Twenty-nine women (82.8%) had a history of gynecological or obstetrical surgery, most commonly cesarean section (CS). The mean interval between prior surgery and appearance of symptoms was 5.3 years. Six women (17.1%) had no prior surgery; all six presented with umbilical nodules, nulliparity and confirmed mild to severe pelvic endometriosis. Among all patients, 34.3% had concurrent pelvic endometriosis, 40% presented with isolated AWE and 25.7% had no pelvic exploration. Women with concurrent pelvic endometriosis had significantly lower parity, smaller nodule size and a higher likelihood of umbilical location than those with isolated AWE (p < 0.05). A history of CS was more commonly found in women with isolated AWE. The overall recurrence rate over the study period was 11.4%, with a mean follow-up period of 5.2 years.

conclusionsAWE is an uncommon condition associated with long diagnostic and therapeutic delays. In patients with umbilical AWE and no surgical history, pelvic endometriosis is commonly present and should be highly suspected.

Indexed as

Abdominal wallCesarean sectionEndometriosisParietal repair

Identifiers

PMID31650130
PMCPMC6804734
OpenAlexW2974653749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.