Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650118›Full record

ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2019

Evaluation of the predictive power of laboratory markers in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly.

Savas Bayrak, Cihad Tatar, Ekrem Cakar, Sukru Colak, Mehmet Emin Gunes, Kemal Tekesin, Bunyamin Gurbulak, Erdem Kinaci, Mert Mahsuni Sevinc

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical-pathological features and treatment of acute appendicitis in the very elderly: an interim analysis of the FRAILESEL Italian multicentre prospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Savas BayrakDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cihad TatarDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ekrem CakarDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sukru ColakDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Emin GunesDepartment of General Surgery, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kemal TekesinDepartment of General Surgery, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bunyamin GurbulakDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Erdem KinaciDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mert Mahsuni SevincDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the predictive value of preoperative laboratory findings in acute appendicitis in geriatric patients aged >65 years.

methodsWe enrolled a total of 4121 patients. A retrospective evaluation of the demographic features was made using preoperative laboratory values such as the white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts; platelet counts; the mean platelet volume and bilirubin values; and postoperative pathological data of the patients from the electronic file system. The neutrophil-to-WBC and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios were calculated. Patients were divided into two groups, as geriatric (≥65 years old, n=140) and non-geriatric (<65 years old, n=3981).

resultsThe white blood cell and lymphocyte counts, and the neutrophil-to-WBC ratio, were significantly higher in the non-geriatric group (p<0.001, p=0.013, and p=0.021, respectively). The neutrophil and platelet counts were higher in the non-geriatric group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.073 and p=0.072, respectively). A higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was determined in the geriatric group, but the difference was not significant (p=0.176). According to the optimumal cutoff value of 12.11×10

conclusionWBC values >12.11×10

Indexed as

Acute appendicitisgeriatric patientslaboratory parameters

Identifiers

PMID31650118
PMCPMC6790928
OpenAlexW2949252595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.