Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650104›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on behavior science2019

Changing Delay Discounting and Impulsive Choice: Implications for Addictions, Prevention, and Human Health.

Jillian M Rung, Sara Peck, Jay Hinnenkamp, Emma Preston, Gregory J Madden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on behavior science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A web-based episodic specificity and future thinking session modulates delay discounting in cannabis users.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Trial
  4. The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Associations Between Steep Delay Discounting and Punishment Learning.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jillian M RungDivision of Behavioral Medicine, University of Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences.
Sara PeckDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.
Jay HinnenkampDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.
Emma PrestonDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.
Gregory J MaddenDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.
Utah State University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Delay Exposure Training Produces Large and Lasting Changes in Impulsive Choice – Why?R21DA042174 · NIDA · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, GREGORY J · 2016 to 2017
$388k
Delay Exposure Training and Allomorphic ChoiceR03DA044927 · NIDA · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, GREGORY J · 2018 to 2019
$145k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA044927NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA042174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting describes the tendency to devalue delayed consequences or future prospects. The degree to which an individual discounts delayed events appears trait-like in that it is stable over time and across functionally similar situations. Steeply discounting delayed rewards is correlated with most substance-use disorders, the severity of these disorders, rates of relapse to drug use, and a host of other maladaptive decisions impacting human health. Longitudinal data suggest steep delay discounting and high levels of impulsive choice are predictive of subsequent drug taking, which suggests (though does not establish) that reducing delay discounting could have a preventive health-promoting effect. Experimental manipulations that produce momentary or long-lasting reductions in delay discounting or impulsive choice are reviewed, and behavioral mechanisms that may underlie these effects are discussed. Shortcomings of each manipulation technique are discussed and areas for future research are identified. While much work remains, it is clear that impulsive decision-making can be reduced, despite its otherwise trait-like qualities. Such findings invite technique refinement, translational research, and hope.

Indexed as

AddictionDelay DiscountingDelay-Exposure TrainingDelay FadingImpulsive ChoiceSubstance Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID31650104
PMCPMC6768935
OpenAlexW2944765522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.