Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650065›Full record

ArticleIBRO reports2019

Microglial response patterns following damage to the zebrafish olfactory bulb.

Susanna R Var, Christine A Byrd-Jacobs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ultrastructural Characteristics of the Juvenile Chum Salmon (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Structural Regeneration and Functional Recovery of the Olfactory System of Adult Zebrafish Following Brain Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Glial cells in the mammalian olfactory bulb.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Role of Macrophages and Microglia in Zebrafish Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susanna R VarWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49008-5410 USA.
Christine A Byrd-JacobsWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49008-5410 USA.
Western Michigan University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inherent plasticity of the zebrafish olfactory system serves as a useful model for examining immune cell responses after injury. Microglia are the resident immune cells of the CNS that respond to damage by migrating to the site of injury and phagocytizing neuronal debris. While the olfactory system is renowned for its ability to recover from damage, the specific mechanisms of microglial involvement in olfactory system plasticity are unknown. To approach the potentially time-dependent effects of microglial activation after injury, we performed a time course analysis of microglial response profiles and patterns following different forms of damage: deafferentation by cautery ablation of the olfactory organ, deafferentation by chemical ablation of the olfactory epithelium, and direct lesioning of the olfactory bulb. Our aim was to demonstrate that immunocytochemistry and microscopy methods in zebrafish can be used to determine the timing of distinct microglial response patterns following various forms of injury. We found that permanent and temporary forms of damage to the olfactory bulb resulted in different microglial response profiles from 1 to 72 h after injury, suggesting that there may be critical timepoints in which microglia are activated that contribute to tissue and neuronal repair with a regenerative outcome versus a degenerative outcome. These distinctions between the different forms of damage suggest temporal changes relative to the potential for regeneration, since cautery deafferentation is permanent and unrecoverable while chemical ablation deafferentation and direct lesioning is reversible and can be used to observe the microglial relationship in neural regeneration and functional recovery in future studies.

Indexed as

DeafferentationDirect lesionImmune responseir, immunoreactiveMicrogliaOlfactory bulbOSN, olfactory sensory neuronZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID31650065
PMCPMC6804743
OpenAlexW2970094458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.