Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650019›Full record

ArticleSports medicine international open2019

Changes in Flexibility and Force are not Different after Static Versus Dynamic Stretching.

Shingo Matsuo, Masahiro Iwata, Manabu Miyazaki, Taizan Fukaya, Eiji Yamanaka, Kentaro Nagata, Wakako Tsuchida, Yuji Asai, Shigeyuki Suzuki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine international open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Dynamic Warm-ups Play Pivotal Role in Athletic Performance and Injury Prevention.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shingo MatsuoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nihon Fukushi University, Handa, Japan.
Masahiro IwataDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nihon Fukushi University, Handa, Japan.
Manabu MiyazakiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medical Science for Health, Teikyo Heisei University, Toshima-ku, Japan.
Taizan FukayaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kyoto Kujo Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Eiji YamanakaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Narashino, Japan.
Kentaro NagataDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Japan.
Wakako TsuchidaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nihon Fukushi University, Handa, Japan.
Yuji AsaiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nihon Fukushi University, Handa, Japan.
Shigeyuki SuzukiDepartment of Health and Sports Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Asahi University, Mizuho, Japan.
Nihon Fukushi University · JPHebei Rehabilitation Hospital · JPKariya Toyota General Hospital · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPMizuho (Japan) · JPNagoya University · JPTeikyo Heisei University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effects of static and dynamic stretching on range of motion (ROM), passive torque (PT) at pain onset, passive stiffness, and isometric muscle force. We conducted a randomized crossover trial in which 16 healthy young men performed a total of 300 s of active static or dynamic stretching of the right knee flexors on two separate days in random order. To assess the effects of stretching, we measured the ROM, PT at pain onset, passive stiffness during passive knee extension, and maximum voluntary isometric knee flexion force using an isokinetic dynamometer immediately before and after stretching. Both static and dynamic stretching significantly increased the ROM and PT at pain onset (p<0.01) and significantly decreased the passive stiffness and isometric knee flexion force immediately after stretching (p<0.01). However, the magnitude of change did not differ between the two stretching methods for any measurements. Our results suggest that 300 s of either static or dynamic stretching can increase flexibility and decrease isometric muscle force; however, the effects of stretching do not appear to differ between the two stretching methods.

Indexed as

muscle forcepassive stiffnesspassive torquerange of motionwarm-up exercise

Identifiers

PMID31650019
PMCPMC6811350
OpenAlexW2981640354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.