Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31649995›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2019

International trade, dietary change, and cardiovascular disease health outcomes: Import tariff reform using an integrated macroeconomic, environmental and health modelling framework for Thailand.

Henning Tarp Jensen, Marcus R Keogh-Brown, Bhavani Shankar, Wichai Aekplakorn, Sanjay Basu, Soledad Cuevas, Alan D Dangour, Shabbir H Gheewala, Rosemary Green, Edward Joy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International Trade and Health in Thailand: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Henning Tarp JensenLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Marcus R Keogh-BrownLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Bhavani ShankarSOAS University of London, UK.
Wichai AekplakornRamathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Sanjay BasuStanford University, USA.
Soledad CuevasLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Alan D DangourLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Shabbir H GheewalaKing Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Thailand.
Rosemary GreenLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Edward JoyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Nipa RojroongwasinkulInstitute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Nalitra ThaiprasertChiang Mai University, Thailand.
Richard D SmithLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

United Nations (UN) member states have, since 2011, worked to address the emerging global NCD crisis, but progress has, so far, been insufficient. Food trade policy is recognised to have the potential to impact certain major diet-related health and environmental outcomes. We study the potential for using import tariff protection as a health and environmental policy instrument. Specifically, we apply a rigorous and consistent Macroeconomic-Environmental-Demographic-health (MED-health) simulation model framework to study fiscal food policy import tariffs and dietary change in Thailand over the future 20 year period 2016-2035. We find that the existing Thai tariff structure, by lowering imports, lowers agricultural Land Use Change (LUC)-related GHG emissions and protects against cholesterol-related cardiovascular disease (CVD). This confirms previous evidence that food trade, measured by import shares of food expenditures and caloric intakes, is correlated with unhealthy eating and adverse health outcomes among importing country populations. A continued drive towards tariff liberalization and economic efficiency in Thailand may therefore come at the expense of reduced health and environmental sustainability of food consumption and production systems. Due to large efficiency losses, the existing tariff structure is, however, not cost-effective as an environmental or health policy instrument. However, additional simulations confirm that stylized 30% food sector import tariffs generally improve nutritional, clinical health, demographic, and environmental indicators across the board. We also find that diet-related health improvements can go hand-in-hand with increased Saturated Fatty Acid (SFA) intakes. Despite limited cost-effectiveness, policy makers from Thailand and abroad, including WHO, would therefore be well advised to consider targeted fiscal food policy tariffs as a potential intervention to maintain combined health and environmental sustainability, and to reconsider the specification of WHO dietary guidelines with their focus on SFA intake (rather than composition of fatty acid intake) targets.

Indexed as

CGEDietImport tariffsInternational tradeSimulation

Identifiers

PMID31649995
PMCPMC6804685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.