ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2019
Comparative analysis of high CRP-levels in human blood using point-of-care and laboratory-based methods.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Choline Intake Is Inversely Associated with Inflammation in Pregnancy - Evidence from the Canadian APrON Cohort.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Vitamin D, C-Reactive Protein, and Increased Fall Risk: A Genetic Epidemiological Study.Nutrients · 2024Observational
- Elevated Inflammation and Poor Diet Quality Associated with Lower eGFR in United States Adults: An NHANES 2015-2018 Analysis.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Immunosensors Using Nanobodies as Biocompatible Sniffer Tools of Agricultural Contaminants and Human Disease Biomarkers.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection.Biosensors · 2021Article
- Revisiting the clinical usefulness of C-reactive protein in the set of cancer cachexia.Porto biomedical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe use of point-of-care (POC) methods and the measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a diagnostic marker have both increased over the past years. This has led to an increase in POC-methods analysing CRP. High CRP levels are often seen as an indication for the subscription of antibiotics. The quality of POC-systems compared to routine diagnostic measurements for the analysis of CRP is thereby of main importance, since many small practises will use POC-methods. This study compared high-level CRP concentrations (above 100 mg/L) using an i-CHROMA
designand Methods: A total of 199 patient samples with a CRP concentration above 100 mg/L were analysed with the i-CHROMA
resultsThe results of the i-CHROMA
conclusionsThis analysis showed the limitations of the i-CHROMA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.