ArticleComparative cytogenetics2019
Chromosome spreading of the (TTAGGG)n repeats in the
Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phased T2T horse and donkey assemblies from a mule reveal peculiar equid centromere evolution.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Chromosomal puzzle in snakes: adjacent interstitial telomeric sites on chromosome 5 in three species of genus Vipera.Protoplasma · 2026Article
- Telomere organization and the interstitial telomeric sites involvement in insects and vertebrates chromosome evolution.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Telomeric-Like Repeats Flanked by Sequences Retrotranscribed from the Telomerase RNA Inserted at DNA Double-Strand Break Sites during Vertebrate Genome Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Insertion of Telomeric Repeats in the Human and Horse Genomes: An Evolutionary Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Evolutionary Dynamics of the Repetitive DNA in the Karyotypes ofFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pipidae is a clade of Anura that diverged relatively early from other frogs in the phylogeny of the group. Pipids have a unique combination of morphological features, some of which appear to represent a mix of adaptations to aquatic life and plesiomorphic characters of Anura. The present study describes the karyotype of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.