Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31649636›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

Robust Approaches for the Production of Active Ingredient and Drug Product for Human Phage Therapy.

Michele Mutti, Lorenzo Corsini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Antibiotic Resistance ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Bacteriophage therapy for controlling poultry production problems.Iranian journal of veterinary research · 2025
    Review
  13. Beyond Antibiotics: What the Future Holds.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Role of Bacteriophages for Optimized Health and Production of Poultry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Phage Therapy againstPharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michele MuttiPhagoMed Biopharma GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Lorenzo CorsiniPhagoMed Biopharma GmbH, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To be successful, academic and commercial efforts to reintroduce phage therapy must ensure that only safe and efficacious products are used to treat patients. This raises a number of manufacturing, formulation, and delivery challenges. Since phages are biologics, robust manufacturing processes will be crucial to avoid unwanted variability in each step of the process. The quality standards themselves need to be developed, as patients are currently being treated with phages produced under quality standards ranging from cGMP for clinical trials in EMA and FDA regulated environments to no standards at all in some last resort treatments. In this short review, we will systematically review the literature covering technical issues and approaches to increase robustness at every step of the production process: the identity of the phage and bacterial production strains, the fermentation process and purification, the formulation of the drug product, the quality controls and the documentation standards themselves. We conclude that it is possible to control cost at the same time, which is critical to re-introduce phage therapy to western medicine.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancebacteriophagesphage purificationphage therapyPhagoMedquality by design

Identifiers

PMID31649636
PMCPMC6791927
OpenAlexW2980313137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.