Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31649627›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Composition and Drivers of Gut Microbial Communities in Arctic-Breeding Shorebirds.

Kirsten Grond, Jorge W Santo Domingo, Richard B Lanctot, Ari Jumpponen, Rebecca L Bentzen, Megan L Boldenow, Stephen C Brown, Bruce Casler, Jenny A Cunningham, Andrew C Doll and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
18.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Metagenomic Profiling of Barn Owl (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Kirsten GrondDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Jorge W Santo DomingoU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Richard B LanctotMigratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK, United States.
Ari JumpponenDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Rebecca L BentzenWildlife Conservation Society, Fairbanks, AK, United States.
Megan L BoldenowDepartment of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States.
Stephen C BrownManomet Inc., Saxtons River, VT, United States.
Bruce CaslerIndependent Researcher, Nehalem, OR, United States.
Jenny A CunninghamDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Andrew C DollDenver Museum of Nature & Science, Denver, CO, United States.
Scott FreemanArctic National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Fairbanks, AK, United States.
Brooke L HillDepartment of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States.
Steven J KendallArctic National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Fairbanks, AK, United States.
Eunbi KwonDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Joseph R LiebezeitAudubon Society of Portland, Portland, OR, United States.
Lisa Pirie-DominixEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Iqaluit, NU, Canada.
Jennie RauschEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Yellowknife, NT, Canada.
Brett K SandercockDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service · USEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CAKansas State University · USUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks · USDenver Museum of Nature and Science · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USManomet Center for Conservation Sciences · USNational Audubon Society · USNorwegian Institute for Nature Research · NOUniversity of Missouri · USVirginia Tech · USWildlife Conservation Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota can have important effects on host health, but explanatory factors and pathways that determine gut microbial composition can differ among host lineages. In mammals, host phylogeny is one of the main drivers of gut microbiota, a result of vertical transfer of microbiota during birth. In birds, it is less clear what the drivers might be, but both phylogeny and environmental factors may play a role. We investigated host and environmental factors that underlie variation in gut microbiota composition in eight species of migratory shorebirds. We characterized bacterial communities from 375 fecal samples collected from adults of eight shorebird species captured at a network of nine breeding sites in the Arctic and sub-Arctic ecoregions of North America, by sequencing the V4 region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Firmicutes (55.4%), Proteobacteria (13.8%), Fusobacteria (10.2%), and Bacteroidetes (8.1%) dominated the gut microbiota of adult shorebirds. Breeding location was the main driver of variation in gut microbiota of breeding shorebirds (

Indexed as

16S rRNA genebreeding siteenvironmentgut microbiomehost health

Identifiers

PMID31649627
PMCPMC6795060
OpenAlexW2978947290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.