Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31649397›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2019

Efficacy of laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block for patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynaecologic surgery: A randomised control trial.

Anupama Rajanbabu, Nitu Puthenveettil, Akhila Appukuttan, Anjitha Asok

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06731998 (Evaluating Optimal Perioperative Pain Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06731998 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Optimal Perioperative Pain Management: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Local Anesthetic, Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Alone, and Local Anesthetic Alone in Minimally Invasive Oncologic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute)Ran2025 to 2026Enrolled48ConditionsOncologic Surgery, Cancer, Cancer Surgery, Hepatic CancerArmsLocal Anesthesia, Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anupama RajanbabuDepartments of Gynaecological Oncology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Nitu PuthenveettilDepartments of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Akhila AppukuttanDepartments of Gynaecological Oncology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Anjitha AsokDepartments of Gynaecological Oncology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsTransverse abdominis plane (TAP) block has been used regularly as part of multimodal analgesia for caesarean sections and other lower abdominal surgeries. Adequate postoperative analgesia provided with regional blocks allows faster postoperative recovery and better patient satisfaction. In our study, we are comparing the analgesic efficacy of laparoscopic-guided TAP block with port infiltration using a local anaesthetic in patients undergoing gynaecologic robotic surgeries.

methodsAfter obtaining approval from the hospital ethics committee, Central Trial Registry of India (CTRI) clearance and written informed consent from patients, this prospective double-blinded randomised control trial was conducted on patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynaecologic surgery under general anaesthesia. Group B patients received bilateral TAP block under direct laparoscopic vision with 15 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine on each side and Group C patients received routine port site infiltration with 30 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine. Postoperative pain score was measured till 24 hours, need for rescue analgesics, complications associated were noted. Independent two sample 't' test, Mann Whitney u test, Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis.

resultsPain score was significantly lower in Group B patients up to 24h (

conclusionLaparoscopic-guided TAP block is effective and superior to port site infiltration in providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynaecologic surgery.

Indexed as

AnalgesialaparoscopicroboticropivacaineTAP block

Identifiers

PMID31649397
PMCPMC6798625
OpenAlexW2980295852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.