Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31649327›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2019

Towards clinical application of tissue engineering for erectile penile regeneration.

Tom W Andrew, Muholan Kanapathy, Log Murugesan, Asif Muneer, Deepak Kalaskar, Anthony Atala

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tissue Engineering for Penile Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tom W AndrewCentre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. tomwandrew@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2297-0003
Muholan KanapathyCentre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Log MurugesanCentre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Asif MuneerDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Deepak KalaskarCentre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-1816
Anthony AtalaWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
London Centre for Nanotechnology · GBForest Institute · USUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile wounds after traumatic and surgical amputation require reconstruction in the form of autologous tissue transfers. However, currently used techniques are associated with high infection rates, implant erosion and donor site morbidity. The use of tissue-engineered neocorpora provides an alternative treatment option. Contemporary tissue-engineering strategies enable the seeding of a biomaterial scaffold and subsequent implantation to construct a neocorpus. Tissue engineering of penile tissue should focus on two main strategies: first, correcting the volume deficit for structural integrity in order to enable urinary voiding in the standing position and second, achieving erectile function for sexual activity. The functional outcomes of the neocorpus can be addressed by optimizing the use of stem cells and scaffolds, or alternatively, the use of gene therapy. Current research in penile tissue engineering is largely restricted to rodent and rabbit models, but the use of larger animal models should be considered as a better representation of the anatomical and physiological function in humans. The development of a cell-seeded scaffold to achieve and maintain erection continues to be a considerable challenge in humans. However, advances in penile tissue engineering show great promise and, in combination with gene therapy and surgical techniques, have the potential to substantially improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Penile ErectionTissue EngineeringAnimalsCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalHumansMalePenisPlastic Surgery ProceduresRecovery of FunctionRegenerationTissue ScaffoldsUrologic Surgical Procedures, Male

Identifiers

PMID31649327
OpenAlexW2981551463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.