Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31649286›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Hyperalgesia when observing pain-related images is a genuine bias in perception and enhances autonomic responses.

Anaïs Chapon, Caroline Perchet, Luis Garcia-Larrea, Maud Frot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anaïs ChaponNeuroPain lab, Neurosciences Research Center of Lyon, INSERM U1028, Bron, France.
Caroline PerchetNeuroPain lab, Neurosciences Research Center of Lyon, INSERM U1028, Bron, France.
Luis Garcia-LarreaNeuroPain lab, Neurosciences Research Center of Lyon, INSERM U1028, Bron, France.
Maud FrotNeuroPain lab, Neurosciences Research Center of Lyon, INSERM U1028, Bron, France. maud.frot@univ-lyon1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-9256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observing pain in others can enhance our own pain. Two aspects of this effect remain unknown or controversial: first, whether it depends on the 'painfulness' of the visual stimulus; second, whether it reflects a genuine bias in perception or rather a bias in the memory encoding of the percept. Pain ratings and vegetative skin responses were recorded while 21 healthy volunteers received electric nociceptive shocks under three experimental conditions: (i) observing a painful contact between the body and a harmful object; (ii) observing a non-painful body contact, (iii) observing a control scene where the body and the object are not in contact. Pain reports and vegetative responses were enhanced exclusively when the subjects observed a painful body contact. The effect on perception was immediate, abated 3 sec after the shock, and positively correlated with the magnitude of vegetative arousal. This suggests that (a) hyperalgesia during observation of painful scenes was induced by their pain-related nature, and not by the simple body contact, and (b) hyperalgesia emerged from a very rapid bias in the perceptual encoding of the stimulus, and was not the result of a retrospective bias in memory recollection. Observing pain-depicting scenes can modify the processing of concomitant somatic stimuli, increasing their arousal value and shifting perception toward more painful levels.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArousalAutonomic Nervous SystemFemaleHumansHyperalgesiaMalePainPain PerceptionPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31649286
PMCPMC6813318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.