Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648995›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

A urinary metabolite constellation to detect acute rejection in kidney allografts.

Miriam C Banas, Sindy Neumann, Philipp Pagel, Franz Josef Putz, Bernhard K Krämer, Georg A Böhmig, Johannes Eiglsperger, Eric Schiffer, Petra Ruemmele, Bernhard Banas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. T-Cell Remodeling in Renal Fibrosis: From Acute Injury to Chronic Kidney Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miriam C BanasDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: miriam.banas@ukr.de.
Sindy NeumannNumares AG, Regensburg, Germany.
Philipp PagelNumares AG, Regensburg, Germany.
Franz Josef PutzDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Bernhard K KrämerFifth Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Georg A BöhmigDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Johannes EiglspergerNumares AG, Regensburg, Germany.
Eric SchifferNumares AG, Regensburg, Germany.
Petra RuemmeleInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Bernhard BanasDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo validate a novel method for post-transplant surveillance to detect kidney allograft rejection via a characteristic constellation of the urine metabolites alanine, citrate, lactate, and urea investigated by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy a first prospective, observational study was performed.

methodsWithin the UMBRELLA study 986 urine specimens were collected from 109 consecutively enrolled renal transplant recipients, and metabolite constellations were analyzed. A metabolite rejection score was calculated and compared to histopathological results of corresponding indication and protocol allograft biopsies (n = 206).

findingsThe metabolite constellation was found to be a useful biomarker to non-invasively detect acute allograft rejection (AUC = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.83; based on 46 cases and 520 control samples). Combined analysis of the metabolite rejection score and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of urine sampling further improved the overall test performance significantly (AUC = 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.91; based on 42 cases and 468 controls). Regarding the time course analysis in patients without rejection episodes the test results remained well below a diagnostic threshold associated with high risk of acute rejection. In other cases, a marked increase above this threshold indicated acute allograft rejection already six to ten days before diagnostic renal biopsies were performed.

interpretationA combination of an NMR-based urine metabolite analysis and eGFR is promising as a non-invasive test for post-transplant surveillance and to support decision making whether renal allografts need histopathological evaluation.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersBiopsyFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateGraft RejectionHumansKidney Function TestsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveTransplantation, HomologousBiomarkersBiomarkerKidney transplant rejectionNMR-spectroscopyNon-invasive testUrinary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID31648995
PMCPMC6838399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.