Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648993›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA.

Anne Tranberg Madsen, Johanne Andersen Hojbjerg, Boe Sandahl Sorensen, Anne Winther-Larsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell-free DNA Concentration as a Biomarker of Response and Recurrence in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne Tranberg MadsenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Johanne Andersen HojbjergDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Boe Sandahl SorensenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Anne Winther-LarsenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. Electronic address: anlarsen@rm.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous studies have shown that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels may serve as a non-invasive biomarker of a broad spectrum of acute and chronic pathologies. However, in order to make clinical decisions based on cfDNA measurements, it is essential to understand the magnitude of biological variation so this variation is not confused with a variation that actually represent a clinically relevant change. The present study was designed to evaluate the biological variation of cfDNA in healthy subjects and lung cancer patients.

methodsPlasma samples were collected from 33 healthy subjects and ten lung cancer patients over three days, as well as during the same day. CfDNA was quantified using droplet digital PCR. Biological variation data was estimated using mixed models.

findingsThe within-subject variation was 25% and the between-subject variation was 30%. The reference change value for the healthy subjects was 70%. There was no systematic difference in cfDNA levels from day-to-day (p = 0⋅61), but there was a significant decline during the day (p<0⋅01). The within-subject variation in cancer patients was comparable to healthy subjects, whereas the between-subject variation was much larger (139%). No systematic differences from day-to-day were observed for the cancer patients (p>0⋅3).

interpretationOur findings show that cfDNA levels fluctuate significantly during the day and exhibit considerable within-subject variation. Thus, the data presented offer a substantial contribution to the interpretation of the clinical significance of cfDNA.

fundingLæge Sofus Carl Emil Friis og hustru Olga Doris Friis' Legat, Harboefonden, and Dagmar Marshalls Fond.

Indexed as

Biological Variation, IndividualAdultAgedCell-Free Nucleic AcidsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCell-Free Nucleic AcidsBiological variationBiomarkerCancerCfDNADroplet digital PCRMonitoring

Identifiers

PMID31648993
PMCPMC6945267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.