Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648937›Full record

ArticleTrends in plant science2019

NAD

Ming Chang, Michael Clinton, Fengquan Liu, Zheng Qing Fu

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming ChangInstitute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210014, P.R. China; Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Michael ClintonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Fengquan LiuInstitute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210014, P.R. China. Electronic address: fqliu20011@sina.com.
Zheng Qing FuDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. Electronic address: zfu@mailbox.sc.edu.
University of South Carolina · USJiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant resistance proteins play a key role in detecting pathogen infection and activating plant defense. Two recent papers by Horsefield et al. and Wan et al. revealed that the TIR domain in resistance (R) proteins functions as an NAD

Indexed as

NADPlant ProteinsAnimalsCell DeathPlantsNADPlant Proteinscell deatheffectorNAD(+) cleavageresistance proteinTIR domain

Identifiers

PMID31648937
OpenAlexW2982117073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.