Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648644›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2020

Techniques to Overcome Difficulty in Device Deliverability to Lesion in Complex PCI.

Raman Chawla, Wasim Ahamad, Vivek Sharma

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stents and Drug-Coated Balloons in Tortuous Small Coronary Lesions.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raman ChawlaDepartment of Cardiology, CAREMAX Superspeciality Hospital, Punjab 144001, India.
Wasim AhamadDepartment of Cardiology, CAREMAX Superspeciality Hospital, Punjab 144001, India.
Vivek SharmaDepartment of Cardiology, CAREMAX Superspeciality Hospital, Punjab 144001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has revolutionized the management of Coronary Artery Disease and has become the preferred modality of revascularization in a majority of cases. Nevertheless, situations are encountered frequently where device deliverability to coronary lesions entails technical difficulties due to varied anatomies and lesional complexities like tortuosity, calcifications, length of lesions and vessel morphology. While continuous technological refinements are occurring in PCI hardware armamentarium and stent designs, a number of techniques and their modifications and variations have evolved to increase the applicability of PCI to difficult lesions. The present article envisages a thorough review of all aspects of improving successful device deliverability in complex PCI with prominent emphasis on increasing the backup support of Guide Catheters which is the primary factor of success in difficult coronary lesions.

Indexed as

Coronary OcclusionFemaleHumansMalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionStentsTreatment Outcomeanchor balloonbuddy wireChronic Total Occlusion (CTO)Drug-Eluting Stents (DES)guidelinermother-child technique.Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)Transradial Interventions (TRI)

Identifiers

PMID31648644
PMCPMC7460703
OpenAlexW2986911330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.