Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648506›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2019

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of treatment response and mortality in septic shock patients in the intensive care unit

Rabia Sarı, Zuhal Karakurt, Mustafa Ay, Muhammed Emin Çelik, Ülgen Yalaz Tekan, Fulya Çiyiltepe, Feyza Kargın, Cünyet Saltürk, Özlem Yazıcıoğlu Moçin, Gökay Güngör and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Predictors of mortality inThe Journal of international medical research · 2025
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Why should lymphocytes immune profile matter in sepsis?World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of Trends of Procalcitonin and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients of Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Is Carboxyhaemoglobin an Effective Bedside Prognostic Tool for Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients?Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rabia SarıDepartment of Intensive Care, Hatay State Hospital, Hatay, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7597-8297
Zuhal KarakurtDepartment of Intensive Care, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1635-0016
Mustafa AyDepartment of Intensive Care, Batman Regional Hospital, Batman, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-6210-1083
Muhammed Emin ÇelikDepartment of Intensive Care, Ahi Evran Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital, Trabzon, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9865-1551
Ülgen Yalaz TekanDepartment of Neurology, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-3448-7828
Fulya ÇiyiltepeDepartment of Intensive Care, İstanbul Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0959-5202
Feyza KargınDepartment of Intensive Care, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-1217-5284
Cünyet SaltürkDepartment of Intensive Care, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-7459-9210
Özlem Yazıcıoğlu MoçinDepartment of Intensive Care, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3161-6118
Gökay GüngörDepartment of Intensive Care, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-2294-489X
Nalan AdıgüzelDepartment of Intensive Care, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-7033-8494
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAhi Evran University · TRBatman University · TRDr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: While C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-studied marker for predicting treatment response and mortality in sepsis, it was aimed to assess the efficacy of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of mortality and treatment response in sepsis patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, sepsis patients were divided according to the presence of septic shock on the 1st day of ICU stay, and then subgrouped according to mortality. Patient demographics, acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scores, NLR and CRP (on the 1st, 3rd, and last day in the ICU), microbiology data, antibiotic responses, ICU data, and mortality were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the area under curve (AUC) were calculated for the inflammatory markers and ICU severity scores for mortality. Results: Of the 591 (65% male) enrolled patients, 111 (18.8%) were nonsurvivors with shock, 117 (19.8%) were survivors with shock, 330 (55.8%) were survivors without shock, and 33 (5.6%) were nonsurvivors without shock. On the 1st day of ICU stay, the NLR and CRP were similar in all of the groups. On the 3rd day of antibiotic response, the NLR was increased (11.8) in the nonresponsive patients when compared with the partially responsive (11.0) and responsive (8.5) patients. If the NLR was ≥15 on the 3rd day, the mortality odds ratio was 6.96 (CI: 1.4–34.1, P < 0.017). The NLR and CRP on the 1st, 3rd, and last day of ICU stay (0.52, 0.58, 0.78 and 0.56, 0.70, 0.78, respectively) showed a similar increasing trend for mortality. Conclusion: The NLR can predict mortality and antibiotic responsiveness in ICU patients with sepsis and septic shock. If the NLR is >15 on the 3rd day of postantibiotic initiation, the risk of mortality is high and treatment should be reviewed carefully.

Indexed as

LymphocytesNeutrophilsAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesShock, SepticAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive Proteinintensive care unitneutrophil to lymphocyte ratiorespiratory failureSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID31648506
PMCPMC7018205
OpenAlexW2981483179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.