Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648276›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The evolution of haploid chromosome numbers in Meliponini.

Natália Martins Travenzoli, Danon Clemes Cardoso, Hugo de Azevedo Werneck, Tânia Maria Fernandes-Salomão, Mara Garcia Tavares, Denilce Meneses Lopes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A mixed ploidy natural population ofJournal of genetics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natália Martins TravenzoliLaboratório de Citogenética de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Danon Clemes CardosoLaboratório de Genética Evolutiva e de Populações, Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, CEP, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2811-2536
Hugo de Azevedo WerneckLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tânia Maria Fernandes-SalomãoLaboratório de Genética Evolutiva e de Populações, Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, CEP, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Mara Garcia TavaresLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Denilce Meneses LopesLaboratório de Citogenética de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is thought that two evolutionary mechanisms gave rise to chromosomal variation in bees: the first one points to polyploidy as the main cause of chromosomal evolution, while the second, Minimum Interaction Theory (MIT), is more frequently used to explain chromosomal changes in Meliponini and suggests that centric fission is responsible for variations in karyotype. However, differences in chromosome number between Meliponini and its sister taxa and in the karyotype patterns of the Melipona genus cannot be explained by MIT, suggesting that other events were involved in chromosomal evolution. Thus, we assembled cytogenetical and molecular information to reconstruct an ancestral chromosome number for Meliponini and its sister group, Bombini, and propose a hypothesis to explain the evolutionary pathways underpinning chromosomal changes in Meliponini. We hypothesize that the common ancestor shared by the Meliponini and Bombini tribes possessed a chromosome number of n = 18. The karyotype with n = 17 chromosomes was maintained in Meliponini, and variations of haploid numbers possibly originated through additional Robertsonian fissions and fusions. Thus, the low chromosome number would not be an ancestral condition, as predicted by MIT. We then conclude that Robertsonian fission and fusions are unlikely to be the cause of chromosomal rearrangements that originated the current karyotypes in Meliponini.

Indexed as

HaploidyAnimalsBeesChromosomes, InsectEvolution, MolecularKaryotypePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID31648276
PMCPMC6812824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.