Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648261›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Effects of sonication parameters on transcranial focused ultrasound brain stimulation in an ovine model.

Kyungho Yoon, Wonhye Lee, Ji Eun Lee, Linda Xu, Phillip Croce, Lori Foley, Seung-Schik Yoo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in using ultrasound to regulate the nervous system.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyungho YoonDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wonhye LeeDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ji Eun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Linda XuDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Phillip CroceDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lori FoleyTranslational Discovery Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Seung-Schik YooDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5150-9857
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Wearable Transcranial Focused Ultrasound System for Region-specific Functional NeuromodulationR01MH111763 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI YOO, SEUNG-SCHIK · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) has significant potential as a non-invasive brain stimulation modality and novel technique for functional brain mapping, particularly with its advantage of greater spatial selectivity and depth penetration compared to existing non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. As previous studies, primarily carried out in small animals, have demonstrated that sonication parameters affect the stimulation efficiency, further investigation in large animals is necessary to translate this technique into clinical practice. In the present study, we examined the effects of sonication parameters on the transient modification of excitability of cortical and thalamic areas in an ovine model. Guided by anatomical and functional neuroimaging data specific to each animal, 250 kHz FUS was transcranially applied to the primary sensorimotor area associated with the right hind limb and its thalamic projection in sheep (n = 10) across multiple sessions using various combinations of sonication parameters. The degree of effect from FUS was assessed through electrophysiological responses, through analysis of electromyogram and electroencephalographic somatosensory evoked potentials for evaluation of excitatory and suppressive effects, respectively. We found that the modulatory effects were transient and reversible, with specific sonication parameters outperforming others in modulating regional brain activity. Magnetic resonance imaging and histological analysis conducted at different time points after the final sonication session, as well as behavioral observations, showed that repeated exposure to FUS did not damage the underlying brain tissue. Our results suggest that FUS-mediated, non-invasive, region-specific bimodal neuromodulation can be safely achieved in an ovine model, indicating its potential for translation into human studies.

Indexed as

SheepAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainBrain MappingFemaleMagnetic Resonance ImagingSonicationTemperature

Identifiers

PMID31648261
PMCPMC6812789
OpenAlexW2982278900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.