Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648234›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

'We are all serving the same Ugandans': A nationwide mixed-methods evaluation of private sector surgical capacity in Uganda.

Katherine Albutt, Gustaf Drevin, Rachel R Yorlets, Emma Svensson, Didacus B Namanya, Mark G Shrime, Peter Kayima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. It's the DestinationFrontiers in public health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine AlbuttDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1735-7316
Gustaf DrevinProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8472-9629
Rachel R YorletsProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0986-5444
Emma SvenssonProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Didacus B NamanyaMinistry of Health (MOH), Kampala, Uganda.
Mark G ShrimeProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Peter KayimaMbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mbarara, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHalf of all Ugandans (49%) turn to the private or private-not-for-profit (PNFP) sectors when faced with illness, yet little is known about the capacity of these sectors to deliver surgical services. We partnered with the Ministry of Health to conduct a nationwide mixed-methods evaluation of private and PNFP surgical capacity in Uganda.

methodsA standardized validated facility assessment tool was utilized to assess facility infrastructure, service delivery, workforce, information management, and financing at a randomized nationally representative sample of 16 private and PNFP hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to qualitatively explore facilitating factors and barriers to surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia (SOA) care. Hospitals walk-throughs and retrospective reviews of operative logbooks were completed.

resultsHospitals had a median of 177 beds and two operating rooms. Ten hospitals (62.5%) were able to perform all Bellwether procedures (cesarean section, laparotomy and open fracture treatment). Thirty-day surgical volume averaged 102 cases per facility. While most hospitals had electricity, oxygen, running water, and necessary equipment, many reported pervasive shortages of blood, surgical consumables, and anesthetic drugs. Several themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: (1) geographic distance and limited transportation options delay reaching care; (2) workforce shortages impede the delivery of surgical care; (3) emergency and obstetric volume overwhelm the surgical system; (4) medical and non-medical costs delay seeking, reaching, and receiving care; and (5) there is poor coordination of care with insufficient support systems.

conclusionAs in Uganda's public sector, barriers to surgery in private and PNFP hospitals in Uganda are cross-cutting and closely tied to resource availability. Critical policy and programmatic developments are essential to build and strengthen Ugandan surgical capacity across all sectors.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareAnesthesiologyBlood BanksCesarean SectionEquipment and Supplies, HospitalFemaleHealth ResourcesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLaparotomyOrganizations, NonprofitPregnancyPrivate SectorRetrospective StudiesSurgeonsSurgical Procedures, Operative

Identifiers

PMID31648234
PMCPMC6812829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.