Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648208›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2019

DRG microstimulation evokes postural responses in awake, standing felines.

Kevin W King, William F Cusack, Ameya C Nanivadekar, Christopher A Ayers, M A Urbin, Robert A Gaunt, Lee E Fisher, Douglas J Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin W KingDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America. Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America. Rehabilitation Neural Engineering Laboratories, 3520 Fifth Avenue, Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America. KWK and WFC contributed equally to this work. LEF and DJW contributed equally to this work.
William F Cusack
Ameya C Nanivadekar
Christopher A Ayers
M A Urbin
Robert A Gaunt
Lee E Fisher
Douglas J Weber

Funding

Multichannel Microstimulation of Primary Afferent Neurons to Restore ProprioceptiR01NS072342 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEBER, DOUGLAS J · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe have demonstrated previously that microstimulation in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) can selectively evoke activity in primary afferent neurons in anesthetized cats. This study describes the results of experiments focused on characterizing the postural effects of DRG microstimulation in awake cats during quiet standing. APPROACH: To understand the parameters of stimulation that can affect these postural shifts, we measured changes in ground reaction forces (GRF) while varying stimulation location and amplitude. Four animals were chronically implanted at the L6 and L7 DRG with penetrating multichannel microelectrode arrays. During each week of testing, we identified electrode channels that recruited primary afferent neurons with fast (80-120 m s MAIN

resultsPostural responses were identified by changes in GRFs and were characterized based on their magnitude and latency. During DRG microstimulation, animals did not exhibit obvious signs of distress or discomfort, which could be indicative of pain or aversion to a noxious sensation. Across 56 total weeks, 13 electrode channels evoked behavioral responses, as detected by a significant change in GRF. Stimulation amplitude modulated the magnitude of the GRF responses for these 13 channels (p   <  0.001). It was not possible to predict whether or not an electrode would drive a behavioral response based on information including conduction velocity, recruitment threshold, or the DRG in which it resided. SIGNIFICANCE: The distinct and repeatable effects on the postural response to low amplitude (<40 µA) DRG microstimulation support that this technique may be an effective way to restore somatosensory feedback after neurological injuries such as amputation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsElectric StimulationGanglia, SpinalMaleMicroelectrodesPostural BalanceWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID31648208
PMCPMC9124048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.