Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648198›Full record

ArticleMultisensory research2020

Feeling the Beat (and Seeing It, Too): Vibrotactile, Visual, and Bimodal Rate Discrimination.

Mercedes B Villalonga, Rachel F Sussman, Robert Sekuler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multisensory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mercedes B Villalonga1Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Rachel F Sussman2Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Robert Sekuler2Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.

Funding

Undergraduate and Graduate Training in Computational Neuroscience R90DA033463 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, PAUL · 2011 to 2020
$2.0M
Predoctoral research training at the interface of brain, body, and behaviorT32GM132498 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL DIZIO, ANGELA GUTCHESS · 2019 to 2026
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R90 DA033463NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM132498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beats are among the basic units of perceptual experience. Produced by regular, intermittent stimulation, beats are most commonly associated with audition, but the experience of a beat can result from stimulation in other modalities as well. We studied the robustness of visual, vibrotactile, and bimodal signals as sources of beat perception. Subjects attempted to discriminate between pulse trains delivered at 3 Hz or at 6 Hz. To investigate signal robustness, we intentionally degraded signals on two-thirds of the trials using temporal-domain noise. On these trials, inter-pulse intervals (IPIs) were stochastic, perturbed independently from the nominal IPI by random samples from zero-mean Gaussian distributions with different variances. These perturbations produced directional changes in the IPIs, which either increased or decreased the likelihood of confusing the two pulse rates. In addition to affording an assay of signal robustness, this paradigm made it possible to gauge how subjects' judgments were influenced by successive IPIs. Logistic regression revealed a strong primacy effect: subjects' decisions were disproportionately influenced by a trial's initial IPIs. Response times and parameter estimates from drift-diffusion modeling showed that information accumulates more rapidly with bimodal stimulation than with either unimodal stimulus alone. Analysis of error rates within each condition suggested consistently optimal decision making, even with increased IPI variability. Finally, beat information delivered by vibrotactile signals proved just as robust as information conveyed by visual signals, confirming vibrotactile stimulation's potential as a communication channel.

Indexed as

NoiseAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleReaction TimeTime PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31648198
PMCPMC6990458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.