Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31648059›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

Parental Perceptions of the Internet and Social Media as a Source of Pediatric Health Information.

Mersine A Bryan, Yolanda Evans, Carlie Morishita, Nikita Midamba, Megan Moreno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of ChatGPT's performance on answering pediatric urology questions based on association guidelines.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Content Analysis of a Congenital Cataract Social Media Support Group.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mersine A BryanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute (MA Bryan), Seattle, Wash. Electronic address: mersine@uw.edu.
Yolanda EvansDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine (Y Evans), Seattle, Wash.
Carlie MorishitaUniversity of Washington (C Morishita), Seattle, Wash.
Nikita MidambaSeattle Children's Research Institute (N Midamba), Seattle, Wash.
Megan MorenoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine (M Moreno), Madison, Wis.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective1) To evaluate differences in how parents use the Internet and social media for health information by child age. 2) To examine parental perceptions of health information on social media.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of parents of children 0 to 18 years seen in clinics and an inpatient medical unit. Survey questions focused on: patterns of Internet and social media use, for what topics, and parental ratings of the accuracy, reliability, and appeal of information from social media. Parents' responses were categorized by age of their youngest child in years (0-4, 5-11, 12-18).

resultsA total of 258 parents completed the survey. The mean age was 39.8 years, 83% were female, 59% were white. The most common topics parents read about online were: sleep, mental health, and car safety. Nearly all parents (96%) used social media, with 68% using social media for health information. There were no significant differences in the proportion of parents who reported using social media for health information by child age. Only half of parents discussed information from social media with their physician. Parents of children age ≥5 years rated health information on social media as significantly more accurate than parents of younger children. There were no significant differences in ratings of reliability and appeal by child age.

conclusionsParents of children of all ages use social media for a variety of important topics related to child health. As many parents do not discuss it with their physician, there are missed opportunities for pediatricians to provide high-quality information.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationInternetPediatricsSocial MediaAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleParentsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaireshealth informationparentssocial media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.