SynthesisPloS one2019
Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in healthy Chinese population: A system review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Honokiol-Loaded β-D-Glucan/Chitosan Nanoparticles with Antibacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Activities for Promoting MRSA-Infected Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- In Vitro Activity of Mupirocin Against Methicillin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Nanocurcumin: An Innovative Strategy to Combat Virulence and Methicillin Resistance inIranian journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Interconnections between the food system and antimicrobial resistance: A systems-informed umbrella review from a One Health perspective.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Mapping socioeconomic factors driving antimicrobial resistance in humans: An umbrella review.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Clinical Features and Antibiotic Susceptibility ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- ESKAPE in China: epidemiology and characteristics of antibiotic resistance.Emerging microbes & infections · 2024Review
- Epidemiology of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bacterial isolates and their antimicrobial susceptibility profile of superficial and deep-seated skin and soft tissue infections.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2023Article
- A Novel Strategy to Identify Endolysins with Lytic Activity against Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Systematic analysis of lysine crotonylation in human macrophages responding to MRSA infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Identification of Vancomycin Resistance in Methicillin-resistantFrontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- 7,8-Dihydroxyflavone attenuates the virulence of Staphylococcus aureus by inhibiting alpha-hemolysin.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Article
- Novel Graphene Oxide/Quercetin and Graphene Oxide/Juglone Nanostructured Platforms as Effective Drug Delivery Systems with Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genetic Characteristics of Multiple Copies of Tn1546-Like Elements in ermB-Positive Methicillin-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Drivers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) lineage replacement in China.Genome medicine · 2021Article
- Antibiotic Resistance Pattern ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- MoWa: A Disinfectant for Hospital Surfaces Contaminated With Methicillin-ResistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo comprehensively determine the prevalence of MRSA in healthy Chinese population, the influencing factors of MRSA colonization and its antibiotic resistance.
methodsArticles that studied prevalence or influencing factors of MRSA carriage in healthy Chinese population were retrieved from PubMed, Ovid database, three Chinese electronic databases. The pooled prevalence of MRSA, its antibiotic resistance and influencing factors were analyzed by STATA12.0.
results37 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of MRSA was 21.2% (95% CI: 18.5%-23.9%), and the prevalence of S.aureus was 15% (95% CI: 10%-19%), with a significant heterogeneity (MRSA: I2 = 97.6%, P<0.001; S.aureus: I2 = 98.4%, P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, the pooled prevalence of MRSA was 28% (95%CI: 10%-51%) for Livestock-related workers, 18% (95%CI: 11%-26%) for children, 20% (95%CI: 12%-29%) for healthcare workers, 7% (95%CI: 3%-13%) for community residents. The prevalence of MRSA in studies with oxacillin disk diffusion method (28%, 95%CI: 21%-35%) seemed higher than that with the mecA gene method(12%, 95%CI: 7%-19%). MRSA in studies conducted in Taiwan was more common than in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Similar results were found in meta-regression. Influencing factors for MRSA colonization were noted in seven eligible studies, they included younger age (OR: 3.54, 95% CI: 2.38-5.26; OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.73-2.9), attending day care centers (DCCs) (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.4-2.72; OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.2-1.95), flu vaccination (OR:1.73, 95% CI: 1.28-2.35), using antibiotics within the past year (OR: 2.05, 95% CI:1.35-3.11), residing in northern Taiwan (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.19-1.77), regular visits to health care facility (OR: 23.83, 95% CI: 2.72-209.01), household member working in health care facility (OR: 8.98, 95% CI:1.4-55.63), and contact with livestock (OR: 6.31, 95% CI: 3.44-11.57). Moreover, MRSA was found to be highly resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, erythromycin, and clindamycin, with a pooled resistance ratio of 100, 93, 88, and 75%, respectively. However, no resistance were noted to vancomycin.
conclusionThe pooled prevalence of MRSA was considerably high in health Chinese population. Additionally, these strains showed extreme resistance to penicillin, ampicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin. Public MRSA protection measures and the surveillance of MRSA should be strengthened to reduce the spread of MRSA among hospitals, communities, and livestock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.