Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647828›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li Xiao, Lu Jia, Rongshan Li, Yu Zhang, Hongming Ji, Andrew Faramand

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Li XiaoChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Lu JiaShanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Rongshan LiShanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Yu ZhangAffiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hongming JiShanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Andrew FaramandUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Shanxi Medical University · CNChengdu University · CNChengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital · CNUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury is associated with high mortality, and is the most frequent complication encountered in patients residing in the intensive care unit. Although renal replacement therapy (RRT) is the standard of care for acute kidney injury, the optimal timing for initiation is still unknown.

methodsWe conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating early versus late initiation of RRT in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception to October 15, 2018. We screened studies and extracted data from published reported independently. The primary outcome was short-term mortality.

resultsA total of 2242 patients were included from 11 trials. No statistically significant effect was found for early versus late initiation of RRT on short-term mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.17, p = 0.93) or long-term mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.13, p = 0.76). There were also no statistically significant effects on ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, recovery of renal function, and renal replacement therapy dependence. Early initiation of RRT decreased the risk of metabolic acidosis (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99, p = 0.04), but increased the risk of hypotension (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.43, p = 0.003).

conclusionsIn critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, early compared with late initiation of RRT is not associated with favorable mortality outcomes, although it appears to reduce the risk of metabolic acidosis.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAcute Kidney InjuryCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMortalityOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime-to-TreatmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31647828
PMCPMC6812871
OpenAlexW2982242138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.