ArticlePloS one2019
Robust sound event detection in bioacoustic sensor networks.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two-stage acoustic detection and fine-grained classification of laying-hen vocalizations for heat-stress monitoring.Poultry science · 2026Article
- A lightweight CNN-transformer hybrid architecture with channel attention for real-time hazardous acoustic event detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Improving Greater Caribbean manatee vocalization detection across habitats using neural networks.PloS one · 2026Article
- Noise-Resilient Bioacoustics Feature Extraction Methods and Their Implications on Audio Classification Performance: Systematic Review.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Automating timeScientific reports · 2025Article
- Environmental Noise Dataset for Sound Event Classification and Detection.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A dataset of acoustic measurements from soundscapes collected worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Extensive data engineering to the rescue: building a multi-species katydid detector from unbalanced, atypical training datasets.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Bat2Web: A Framework for Real-Time Classification of Bat Species Echolocation Signals Using Audio Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Real-time biodiversity analysis using deep-learning algorithms on mobile robotic platforms.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- NEAL: an open-source tool for audio annotation.PeerJ · 2023Article
- A Review of Automated Bioacoustics and General Acoustics Classification Research.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Automated identification of chicken distress vocalizations using deep learning models.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Review
- Utilizing DeepSqueak for automatic detection and classification of mammalian vocalizations: a case study on primate vocalizations.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Drivers of fatal bird collisions in an urban center.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Advances in automatic identification of flying insects using optical sensors and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Toward a Computational Neuroethology of Vocal Communication: From Bioacoustics to Neurophysiology, Emerging Tools and Future Directions.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioacoustic sensors, sometimes known as autonomous recording units (ARUs), can record sounds of wildlife over long periods of time in scalable and minimally invasive ways. Deriving per-species abundance estimates from these sensors requires detection, classification, and quantification of animal vocalizations as individual acoustic events. Yet, variability in ambient noise, both over time and across sensors, hinders the reliability of current automated systems for sound event detection (SED), such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) in the time-frequency domain. In this article, we develop, benchmark, and combine several machine listening techniques to improve the generalizability of SED models across heterogeneous acoustic environments. As a case study, we consider the problem of detecting avian flight calls from a ten-hour recording of nocturnal bird migration, recorded by a network of six ARUs in the presence of heterogeneous background noise. Starting from a CNN yielding state-of-the-art accuracy on this task, we introduce two noise adaptation techniques, respectively integrating short-term (60 ms) and long-term (30 min) context. First, we apply per-channel energy normalization (PCEN) in the time-frequency domain, which applies short-term automatic gain control to every subband in the mel-frequency spectrogram. Secondly, we replace the last dense layer in the network by a context-adaptive neural network (CA-NN) layer, i.e. an affine layer whose weights are dynamically adapted at prediction time by an auxiliary network taking long-term summary statistics of spectrotemporal features as input. We show that PCEN reduces temporal overfitting across dawn vs. dusk audio clips whereas context adaptation on PCEN-based summary statistics reduces spatial overfitting across sensor locations. Moreover, combining them yields state-of-the-art results that are unmatched by artificial data augmentation alone. We release a pre-trained version of our best performing system under the name of BirdVoxDetect, a ready-to-use detector of avian flight calls in field recordings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.