Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647721›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2019

Reactance and elastance as measures of small airways response to bronchodilator in asthma.

S A Bhatawadekar, D Leary, V de Lange, U Peters, S Fulton, P Hernandez, C McParland, G N Maksym

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Improving asthma outcomes: Clinicians' perspectives on peripheral airways.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lung Function Assessment by Impulse Oscillometry in Adults.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S A BhatawadekarSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2980-055X
D LearyDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
V de LangeSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
U PetersDepartment of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.ORCID 0000-0002-2491-9519
S FultonDivision of Respirology, QE-II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
P HernandezDivision of Respirology, QE-II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
C McParlandDivision of Respirology, QE-II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
G N MaksymSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversity of Vermont · USColorado State University · USQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchodilation alters both respiratory system resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) in asthma, but how changes in Rrs and Xrs compare, and respond differently in health and asthma, in reflecting the contributions from the large and small airways has not been assessed. We assessed reversibility using spirometry and oscillometry in healthy and asthma subjects. Using a multibranch airway-tree model with the mechanics of upper airway shunt, we compared the effects of airway dilation and small airways recruitment to explain the changes in Rrs and Xrs. Bronchodilator decreased Rrs by 23.0 (19.0)% in 18 asthma subjects and by 13.5 (19.5)% in 18 healthy subjects. Estimated respiratory system elastance (Ers) decreased by 23.2 (21.4)% in asthma, with no significant decrease in healthy subjects. With the use of the model, airway recruitment of 15% across a generation of the small airways could explain the changes in Ers in asthma with no recruitment in healthy subjects. In asthma, recruitment accounted for 40% of the changes in Rrs, with the remaining explained by airway dilation of 6.8% attributable largely to the central airways. Interestingly, the same dilation magnitude explained the changes in Rrs in healthy subjects. Shunt only affected Rrs of the model. Ers was unaltered in health and unaffected by shunt in both groups. In asthma, Ers changed comparably to Rrs and could be attributed to small airways, while the change in Rrs was split between large and small airways. This implies that in asthma Ers sensed through Xrs may be a more effective measure of small airways obstruction and recruitment than Rrs.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAirway ResistanceAsthmaBronchiolesBronchodilator AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBronchodilator Agentsforced oscillation techniqueheterogeneityreactancereversibilitysmall airways

Identifiers

PMID31647721
PMCPMC6962609
OpenAlexW2982145478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.