Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647503›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2020

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, and Docetaxel for Patients With Early or Locally Advanced ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer in Asia: The PEONY Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zhimin Shao, Da Pang, Hongjian Yang, Wei Li, Shusen Wang, Shude Cui, Ning Liao, Yongsheng Wang, Chuan Wang, Yuan-Ching Chang and 11 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 134 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02586025 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate Pertuzumab in Combination With Docetaxel and Trastuzumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy, and Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab as Adjuvant Therapy After Surgery and Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage or Locally Advanced HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2016 to 2022Enrolled329ConditionsBreast CancerArmsFEC Chemotherapy, Surgery, Docetaxel, Pertuzumab, Placebo
NCT05931042 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Neoadjuvant Therapy With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy and the Resultant Pathologic Complete Response Observed in HER2 Positive Breast Cancer;a Systematic Review

TypeobservationalSponsorRawalpindi Medical CollegeRan2023 to 2023Enrolled1,209ConditionsHER2+ Breast CancerArmsTrastuzumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Dual neoadjuvant blockade plus chemotherapy versus monotherapy for the treatment of women with non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 18 institutions in 4 countries.

Zhimin ShaoBreast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Da PangBreast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Hongjian YangBreast Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Wei LiMedicine-Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shusen WangMedicine-Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Shude CuiDepartment of Breast Disease, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ning LiaoDepartment of Breast Disease, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yongsheng WangBreast Disease Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, China.
Chuan WangBreast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yuan-Ching ChangDepartment of General Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hweichung WangDepartment of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Seok Yun KangDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hong SeoDivision of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kunwei ShenBreast Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Suphawat LaohawiriyakamolDepartment of Surgery, Songklanagarind Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Zefei JiangMedicine-Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Military Medical Sciences (The 307th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army), Beijing, China.
Junjie LiBreast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Julian ZhouBiometrics, Roche Product Development, Shanghai, China.
Betsy AlthausProduct Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California.
Yixiang MaoRoche Product Development, Shanghai, China.
Jennifer Eng-WongProduct Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN307th Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army · CNAjou University · KRChina Medical University Hospital · TWFirst Hospital of Jilin University · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CNHarbin Medical University · CNHenan Cancer Hospital · CNKorea University Medical Center · KRMackay Memorial Hospital · TWRoche (China) · CNRuijin Hospital · CNShandong First Medical University · CNShanghai Clinical Research Center · CNSongklanagarind Hospital · THSun Yat-sen University · CNUnion Hospital · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prospective assessment of treatments known to benefit patients in global clinical trials in specific racial groups is essential. Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and docetaxel vs placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in Asian patients with ERBB2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial enrolled 329 women with ERBB2-positive early (T2-3, N0-1, M0) or locally advanced breast cancer (T2-3, N2 or N3, M0; T4, any N, M0) and primary tumor larger than 2 cm from March 14, 2016, to March 13, 2017. Analysis of the primary end point was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Interventions: Before surgery, patients received 4 cycles of intravenous pertuzumab (840-mg loading dose and 420-mg maintenance doses), trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose and 6-mg/kg maintenance doses), and docetaxel (75 mg/m2) or intravenous placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel every 3 weeks. After surgery, patients received 3 cycles of intravenous fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by 13 cycles of the same intravenous anti-ERBB2 therapy (pertuzumab and trastuzumab or placebo and trastuzumab) for up to 1 year. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was independent review committee-assessed total pathologic complete response rate. The 2-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by disease category and hormone receptor status, was used to compare rates between treatment groups. Results: In total, 329 female patients were randomized (pertuzumab, 219; and placebo, 110; mean [SD] age, 48.8 [9.5] years). In the intention-to-treat population, total pathologic complete response rates were 39.3% (86 of 219) in the pertuzumab group and 21.8% (24 of 110) in the placebo group (difference, 17.5% [95% CI, 6.9%-28.0%]; P = .001). Of the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events, there was a higher incidence of neutropenia in the pertuzumab group (83 of 218 [38.1%] vs 36 of 110 [32.7%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 10.1% of patients (22 of 218) in the pertuzumab group and 8.2% of patients (9 of 110) in the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the total pathologic complete response rate vs placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for the neoadjuvant treatment of ERBB2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer in Asian patients. Safety data were in line with the known pertuzumab safety profile and generally comparable between treatment groups. The PEONY trial adds to the totality of data showing the benefit of the pertuzumab regimen. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02586025.

Indexed as

Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAsiaBreast NeoplasmsDocetaxelDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDocetaxelERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasespertuzumabTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID31647503
PMCPMC6813591
OpenAlexW2981669117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.