Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647488›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2019

Non-monotonic dependence of stiffness on actin crosslinking in cytoskeleton composites.

Madison L Francis, Shea N Ricketts, Leila Farhadi, Michael J Rust, Moumita Das, Jennifer L Ross, Rae M Robertson-Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madison L FrancisDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110, USA. randerson@sandiego.edu.
Shea N RickettsDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110, USA. randerson@sandiego.edu.
Leila FarhadiDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 666 N. Pleasant St., Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Michael J RustDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, 900 E 57th St, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Moumita DasSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester Institute of Technology, 84 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Jennifer L RossDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 666 N. Pleasant St., Amherst, MA 01003, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4838-3798
Rae M Robertson-AndersonDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110, USA. randerson@sandiego.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4475-4667

Funding

Biomimetic cytoskeleton and advanced microscopy to reveal intracellular DNA dynamics and distributionsR15GM123420 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO · PI MCGORTY, RYAN, ROBERTSON-ANDERSON, RAE MARIE · 2017 to 2022
$939k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM123420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cytoskeleton is able to precisely tune its structure and mechanics through interactions between semiflexible actin filaments, rigid microtubules and a suite of crosslinker proteins. However, the role that each of these components, as well as the interactions between them, plays in the dynamics of the composite cytoskeleton remains an open question. Here, we use optical tweezers microrheology and fluorescence confocal microscopy to reveal the surprising ways in which actin crosslinking tunes the viscoelasticity and mobility of actin-microtubule composites from steady-state to the highly nonlinear regime. While previous studies have shown that increasing crosslinking in actin networks increases elasticity and stiffness, we instead find that composite stiffness displays a striking non-monotonic dependence on actin crosslinking - first increasing then decreasing to a response similar to or even lower than un-linked composites. We further show that actin crosslinking has an unexpectedly strong impact on the mobility of microtubules; and it is in fact the microtubule mobility - dictated by crosslinker-driven rearrangements of actin filaments - that controls composite stiffness. This result is at odds with conventional thought that actin mobility drives cytoskeleton mechanics. More generally, our results demonstrate that - when crosslinking composite materials to confer strength and resilience - more is not always better.

Indexed as

ActinsCross-Linking ReagentsCytoskeletonElasticityFluorescent DyesKineticsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicrotubulesOptical TweezersStress, MechanicalViscosityActinsCross-Linking ReagentsFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID31647488
PMCPMC6854303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.