Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647471›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2019

Passive Monitoring of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Use via Digital Platform in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Quality Improvement Retrospective Analysis.

Jessica Chen, Leanne Kaye, Michael Tuffli, Meredith A Barrett, Shelanda Jones-Ford, Tina Shenouda, Rahul Gondalia, Kelly Henderson, Veronica Combs, David Van Sickle and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Remote monitoring in asthma: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Measuring adherence to therapy in airways disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica ChenChenMed, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5444-0130
Leanne KayePropeller Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5345-7026
Michael TuffliPropeller Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4312-8402
Meredith A BarrettPropeller Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2559-199X
Shelanda Jones-FordJenCare Senior Medical Center, Louisville, KY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-1106
Tina ShenoudaJenCare Senior Medical Center, Louisville, KY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-785X
Rahul GondaliaPropeller Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5976-4863
Kelly HendersonPropeller Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8684-5367
Veronica CombsContent Strategy Solutions, Louisville, KY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2478-7138
David Van SicklePropeller Health, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-2060
David A StempelPropeller Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0125-9757
MemorialCare Health System · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health programs assist patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to better manage their disease. Technological and adoption barriers have been perceived as a limitation.

objectiveThe aim of the research was to evaluate a digital quality improvement pilot in Medicare-eligible patients with COPD.

methodsCOPD patients were enrolled in a digital platform to help manage their medications and symptoms as part of their routine clinical care. Patients were provided with electronic medication monitors (EMMs) to monitor short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use passively and a smartphone app to track use trends and receive feedback. Providers also had access to data collected via a secure website and were sent email notifications if a patient had a significant change in their prescribed inhaler use. Providers then determined if follow-up was needed. Change in SABA use and feasibility outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months.

resultsA total of 190 patients enrolled in the pilot. At 3, 6, and 12 months, patients recorded significant reductions in daily and nighttime SABA use and increases in SABA-free days (all P<.001). Patient engagement, as measured by the ratio of daily active use to monthly active use, was >90% at both 6 and 12 months. Retention at 6 months was 81% (154/190). Providers were sent on average two email notifications per patient during the 12-month program.

conclusionsA digital health program integrated as part of standard clinical practice was feasible and had low provider burden. The pilot demonstrated significant reduction in SABA use and increased SABA-free days among Medicare-eligible COPD patients. Further, patients readily adopted the digital platform and demonstrated strong engagement and retention rates at 6 and 12 months.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasehealth servicesnebulizers and vaporizersquality improvement, feasibilitytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31647471
PMCPMC7010108
OpenAlexW2981361883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.