Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647422›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2020

A Multi-Organ Nucleus Segmentation Challenge.

Neeraj Kumar, Ruchika Verma, Deepak Anand, Yanning Zhou, Omer Fahri Onder, Efstratios Tsougenis, Hao Chen, Pheng-Ann Heng, Jiahui Li, Zhiqiang Hu and 77 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Spinal morphology-based multimodal AI for predicting pulmonary dysfunction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

87 authors.

Neeraj Kumar
Ruchika Verma
Deepak Anand
Yanning Zhou
Omer Fahri Onder
Efstratios Tsougenis
Hao Chen
Pheng-Ann Heng
Jiahui Li
Zhiqiang Hu
Yunzhi Wang
Navid Alemi Koohbanani
Mostafa Jahanifar
Neda Zamani Tajeddin
Ali Gooya
Nasir Rajpoot
Xuhua Ren
Sihang Zhou
Qian Wang
Dinggang Shen
Cheng-Kun Yang
Chi-Hung Weng
Wei-Hsiang Yu
Chao-Yuan Yeh
Shuang Yang
Shuoyu Xu
Pak Hei Yeung
Peng Sun
Amirreza Mahbod
Gerald Schaefer
Isabella Ellinger
Rupert Ecker
Orjan Smedby
Chunliang Wang
Benjamin Chidester
That-Vinh Ton
Minh-Triet Tran
Jian Ma
Minh N Do
Simon Graham
Quoc Dang Vu
Jin Tae Kwak
Akshaykumar Gunda
Raviteja Chunduri
Corey Hu
Xiaoyang Zhou
Dariush Lotfi
Reza Safdari
Antanas Kascenas
Alison O'Neil
Dennis Eschweiler
Johannes Stegmaier
Yanping Cui
Baocai Yin
Kailin Chen
Xinmei Tian
Philipp Gruening
Erhardt Barth
Elad Arbel
Itay Remer
Amir Ben-Dor
Ekaterina Sirazitdinova
Matthias Kohl
Stefan Braunewell
Yuexiang Li
Xinpeng Xie
Linlin Shen
Jun Ma
Krishanu Das Baksi
Mohammad Azam Khan
Jaegul Choo
Adrian Colomer
Valery Naranjo
Linmin Pei
Khan M Iftekharuddin
Kaushiki Roy
Debotosh Bhattacharjee
Anibal Pedraza
Maria Gloria Bueno
Sabarinathan Devanathan
Saravanan Radhakrishnan
Praveen Koduganty
Zihan Wu
Guanyu Cai
Xiaojie Liu
Yuqin Wang
Amit Sethi

Funding

UIC CANCER PREVENTION &CONTROL RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTR25CA057699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FITZGIBBON, MARIAN L. · 1992 to 2017
$8.2M
Quantitative imaging and molecular data modeling for brain tumor recurrence and progression analysisR01EB020683 · NIBIB · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI Khan M Iftekharuddin · 2016 to 2026
$3.2M
Cancer Health Equity Career Development ProgramT32CA057699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Marian L. Fitzgibbon · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057699NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057699NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalized nucleus segmentation techniques can contribute greatly to reducing the time to develop and validate visual biomarkers for new digital pathology datasets. We summarize the results of MoNuSeg 2018 Challenge whose objective was to develop generalizable nuclei segmentation techniques in digital pathology. The challenge was an official satellite event of the MICCAI 2018 conference in which 32 teams with more than 80 participants from geographically diverse institutes participated. Contestants were given a training set with 30 images from seven organs with annotations of 21,623 individual nuclei. A test dataset with 14 images taken from seven organs, including two organs that did not appear in the training set was released without annotations. Entries were evaluated based on average aggregated Jaccard index (AJI) on the test set to prioritize accurate instance segmentation as opposed to mere semantic segmentation. More than half the teams that completed the challenge outperformed a previous baseline. Among the trends observed that contributed to increased accuracy were the use of color normalization as well as heavy data augmentation. Additionally, fully convolutional networks inspired by variants of U-Net, FCN, and Mask-RCNN were popularly used, typically based on ResNet or VGG base architectures. Watershed segmentation on predicted semantic segmentation maps was a popular post-processing strategy. Several of the top techniques compared favorably to an individual human annotator and can be used with confidence for nuclear morphometrics.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerCell NucleusHumans

Identifiers

PMID31647422
PMCPMC10439521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.