Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647096›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

proGenomes2: an improved database for accurate and consistent habitat, taxonomic and functional annotations of prokaryotic genomes.

Daniel R Mende, Ivica Letunic, Oleksandr M Maistrenko, Thomas S B Schmidt, Alessio Milanese, Lucas Paoli, Ana Hernández-Plaza, Askarbek N Orakov, Sofia K Forslund, Shinichi Sunagawa and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Swarm-seq Reveals Functional Divergence in CsrA Homologs Across Bacteria.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic insights intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daniel R MendeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivica LetunicBiobyte solutions GmbH, Bothestr, 142, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Oleksandr M MaistrenkoStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas S B SchmidtStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Alessio MilaneseStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Lucas PaoliInstitute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Ana Hernández-PlazaCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo-UPM, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
Askarbek N OrakovStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sofia K ForslundMax Delbrück Centre for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Shinichi SunagawaInstitute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Georg ZellerStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jaime Huerta-CepasCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo-UPM, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Pedro CoelhoInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Peer BorkStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiology depends on the availability of annotated microbial genomes for many applications. Comparative genomics approaches have been a major advance, but consistent and accurate annotations of genomes can be hard to obtain. In addition, newer concepts such as the pan-genome concept are still being implemented to help answer biological questions. Hence, we present proGenomes2, which provides 87 920 high-quality genomes in a user-friendly and interactive manner. Genome sequences and annotations can be retrieved individually or by taxonomic clade. Every genome in the database has been assigned to a species cluster and most genomes could be accurately assigned to one or multiple habitats. In addition, general functional annotations and specific annotations of antibiotic resistance genes and single nucleotide variants are provided. In short, proGenomes2 provides threefold more genomes, enhanced habitat annotations, updated taxonomic and functional annotation and improved linkage to the NCBI BioSample database. The database is available at http://progenomes.embl.de/.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialGenomicsComputational BiologyEcosystemInternetMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProkaryotic CellsReproducibility of ResultsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31647096
PMCPMC7145564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.