Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647060›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2019

Reaping the benefits of Open Data in public health.

P Huston, V L Edge, E Bernier

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Methods for safely sharing dual-use genetic data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Prevalence of childhood cancer in Canada: an analysis using 5-year, 18-year and 25-year limited-duration prevalence from the CYP-C data tool.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recommendations for sharing network data and materials.Network science (Cambridge University Press) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. SHARE: An ethical framework for equitable data sharing in Caribbean health research.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  15. Islands of data: cultivating an open data landscape for sustainable development in the Caribbean.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P HustonOffice of the Chief Science Officer, Public Health Agency of Canada, OttawaON.
V L EdgeOffice of the Chief Science Officer, Public Health Agency of Canada, OttawaON.
E BernierOffice of the Chief Science Officer, Public Health Agency of Canada, OttawaON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open Data is part of a broad global movement that is not only advancing science and scientific communication but also transforming modern society and how decisions are made. What began with a call for Open Science and the rise of online journals has extended to Open Data, based on the premise that if reports on data are open, then the generated or supporting data should be open as well. There have been a number of advances in Open Data over the last decade, spearheaded largely by governments. A real benefit of Open Data is not simply that single databases can be used more widely; it is that these data can also be leveraged, shared and combined with other data. Open Data facilitates scientific collaboration, enriches research and advances analytical capacity to inform decisions. In the human and environmental health realms, for example, the ability to access and combine diverse data can advance early signal detection, improve analysis and evaluation, inform program and policy development, increase capacity for public participation, enable transparency and improve accountability. However, challenges remain. Enormous resources are needed to make the technological shift to open and interoperable databases accessible with common protocols and terminology. Amongst data generators and users, this shift also involves a cultural change: from regarding databases as restricted intellectual property, to considering data as a common good. There is a need to address legal and ethical considerations in making this shift. Finally, along with efforts to modify infrastructure and address the cultural, legal and ethical issues, it is important to share the information equitably and effectively. While there is great potential of the open, timely, equitable and straightforward sharing of data, fully realizing the myriad of benefits of Open Data will depend on how effectively these challenges are addressed.

Indexed as

big dataOpen accessOpen DataOpen Sciencepublic health science

Identifiers

PMID31647060
PMCPMC6781855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.