Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647022›Full record

ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2019

Measurable residual disease at myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective registry study on 2780 patients from the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT.

Jiří Pavlů, Myriam Labopin, Riitta Niittyvuopio, Gerard Socié, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Depei Wu, Peter Remenyi, Jakob Passweg, Dietrich W Beelen, Mahmoud Aljurf and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. MRD-guided de-escalation of TBI conditioning in ALL.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. How I treat newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Clinical hematology international · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Jiří PavlůCentre for Haematology, Imperial College London at Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK. jiri@pavlu.co.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5219-5637
Myriam LabopinDepartment of Haematology, EBMT Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC/Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Riitta NiittyvuopioStem Cell Transplantation Unit, HUCH Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Gerard SociéHematology-BMT, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Ibrahim Yakoub-AghaService des Maladies du Sang, Hopital Claude Huriez, CHRU Lille, Lille, France.
Depei WuDepartment of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China.
Peter RemenyiDélpesti Centrumkórház-Országos Hematológiai és Infektológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
Jakob PasswegUniversity Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dietrich W BeelenDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mahmoud AljurfDepartment of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nicolaus KrögerBone Marrow Transplantation Centre, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hélène Labussière-WalletService d'hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.
Zinaida PerićZavod za hematologiju, Klinika za unutarnje bolesti, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sebastian GiebelMaria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Arnon NaglerDivision of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Mohamad MohtyDepartment of Haematology, EBMT Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC/Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Hôpital Saint-Antoine · FREssen University Hospital · DEHammersmith Hospital · GBHôpital Claude Huriez · FRHôpital Lyon Sud · FRKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAOrszágos Pszichiátriai és Neurológiai Intézet · HUSaint Louis University Hospital · USSheba Medical Center · ILSoochow University · CNThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) is rapidly transforming the therapeutic and prognostic landscape of a wide range of hematological malignancies. Its prognostic value in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been established and MRD measured at the end of induction is increasingly used to guide further therapy. Although MRD detectable immediately before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is known to be associated with poor outcomes, it is unclear if or to what extent this differs with different types of conditioning.

methodsIn this retrospective registry study, we explored whether measurable residual disease (MRD) before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with different outcomes in recipients of myeloablative total body irradiation (TBI)-based versus chemotherapy-based conditioning. We analyzed outcomes of 2780 patients (median age 38 years, range 18-72) who underwent first HCT in complete remission between 2000 and 2017 using sibling or unrelated donors.

resultsIn 1816 of patients, no disease was detectable, and in 964 patients, MRD was positive. Conditioning was TBI-based in 2122 (76%) transplants. In the whole cohort MRD positivity was a significant independent factor for lower overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS), and for higher relapse incidence (RI), with respective hazard ratios (HR, 95% confidence intervals) of 1.19 (1.02-1.39), 1.26 (1.1-1.44), and 1.51 (1.26-1.8). TBI was associated with a higher OS, LFS, and lower RI with HR of 0.75 (0.62-0.90), 0.70 (0.60-0.82), and 0.60 (0.49-0.74), respectively. No significant interaction was found between MRD status and conditioning. When investigating the impact of MRD separately in the TBI and chemotherapy-based conditioning cohorts by multivariate analysis, we found MRD positivity to be associated with lower OS and LFS and higher RI in the TBI group, and with higher RI in the chemotherapy group. TBI-based conditioning was associated with improved outcomes in both MRD-negative and MRD-positive patients.

conclusionsIn this large study, we confirmed that patients who are MRD-negative prior to HCT achieve superior outcomes. This is particularly apparent if TBI conditioning is used. All patients with ALL irrespective of MRD status benefit from TBI-based conditioning in the myeloablative setting.

Indexed as

Myeloablative AgonistsNeoplasm, ResidualAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRegistriesRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTransplantation ConditioningMyeloablative AgonistsAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaAllogeneicAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantationMeasurable residual diseaseMyeloablative conditioningTotal body irradiation

Identifiers

PMID31647022
PMCPMC6813121
OpenAlexW2981828827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.