Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31646963›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

The microbiota structure in the cecum of laying hens contributes to dissimilar H

Chun-Bo Huang, Lei Xiao, Si-Cheng Xing, Jing-Yuan Chen, Yi-Wen Yang, Yang Zhou, Wei Chen, Juan-Boo Liang, Jian-Dui Mi, Yan Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Probiotic Potential of a Folate-Producing StrainFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chun-Bo HuangCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Lei XiaoCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Si-Cheng XingCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing-Yuan ChenCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yi-Wen YangCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yang ZhouCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei ChenCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Juan-Boo LiangInstitute of Tropical Agriculture, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Jian-Dui MiCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan WangCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yin-Bao WuCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xin-Di LiaoCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. xdliao@scau.edu.cn.
South China Agricultural University · CNUniversiti Putra Malaysia · MY

Funding

Modern Agroindustry Technology Research System of China CARS-41Natural Science Foundation of China No.31872993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHost genotype plays a crucial role in microbial composition of laying hens, which may lead to dissimilar odor gas production. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship among layer breed, microbial structure and odor production.

resultsThirty Hy-Line Gray and thirty Lohmann Pink laying hens were used in this study to determine the impact of cecal microbial structure on odor production of laying hens. The hens were managed under the same husbandry and dietary regimes. Results of in vivo experiments showed a lower hydrogen sulfide (H

conclusionThe results of this study suggest that genotype of laying hens influence cecal microbiota, which in turn modulates their odor production. Our study provides references for breeding and enteric manipulation for defined microbiota to reduce odor gas emission.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaButyratesCecumChickensFemaleHydrogen SulfideOdorantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SButyratesHydrogen SulfideRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBreedCecumLaying henMicrobiotaOdor

Identifiers

PMID31646963
PMCPMC6813079
OpenAlexW2981436007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.