Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31646937›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2019

Specifying Future Behavior When Assessing Risk Perceptions: Implications for Measurement and Theory.

Erika A Waters, Nicole Ackermann, Courtney S Wheeler

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dismissing "Don't Know" Responses to Perceived Risk Survey Items Threatens the Validity of Theoretical and Empirical Behavior-Change Research.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erika A WatersDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Nicole AckermannDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Courtney S WheelerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Worksite Policies and neighborhood Influences on Obesity and Cancer RiskU54CA155496 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2011 to 2016
$9.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Conditioning, PsychologicalHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRisk Reduction BehaviorAdolescentAdultExerciseFemaleHealth LiteracyHealth SurveysHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adulthealth behavior theorymeasurementrisk perceptionsurvey methods

Identifiers

PMID31646937
PMCPMC6895428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.