Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31646744›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

All things considered, my risk for diabetes is medium: A risk personalization process of familial risk for type 2 diabetes.

Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Lisa L Shah, Kaitlyn Jones, Brenda Rocha, Megan Doerr, Emily Gabitzsch, Thad Meese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. All things considered, my risk for diabetes is medium: A risk personalization process of familial risk for type 2 diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandra Daack-HirschUniversity of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-7154
Lisa L ShahUniversity of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa.
Kaitlyn JonesUniversity of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa.
Brenda RochaUniversity of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa.
Megan DoerrCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Emily GabitzschCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Thad MeeseCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

Targeting Research and Academic Training of Nurses in GenomicsT32NR009759 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CONLEY, YVETTE P · 2006 to 2025
$4.5M
Personal Perspective and Provider Communication of Genomic Risk for T2DMK23NR012972 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI DAACK-HIRSCH, SANDRA · 2011 to 2013
$369k
Communication of Genetic Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death from Probands to RelativesF31NR014758 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SHAH, LISA L · 2014 to 2016
$67k
NINR NIH HHS 5F31NR014758NINR NIH HHS F31 NR014758NINR NIH HHS K23 NR012972NINR NIH HHS T32 NR009759NINR NIH HHS T32NR009759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA positive family history of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with risk awareness and risk-reducing behaviours among the unaffected relatives. Yet, little is known about how people with a positive family history for diabetes develop and manage their personal sense of risk.

objectiveTo characterize two key concepts, salience and vulnerability, within the familial risk perception (FRP) model among unaffected individuals, at increased familial risk for T2D.

designWe conducted a mixed method study. Descriptions of salience and vulnerability were collected through semi-structured interviews. Participant's perception of self-reported risk factors (family history, age, race/ethnicity, medical history, weight and exercise) was measured using the Perceived Risk Factors for T2D Tool and was compared to a clinical evaluation of the same risk factors.

resultsWe identified two components of salience: (a) concern for developing T2D and (b) risk awareness triggers, and two features of vulnerability: (a) statement of risk and (b) risk assessment devices. Although few participants (26%) were concordant between their perceived and clinical overall T2D risk, concordance for individual risk factors was higher, ranging from 42% (medical history) to 90% (family history). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionBoth familial and non-familial events lead people to contemplate their T2D risk, even among people who have a positive family history. Participants often downplayed their overall risk and underestimated their overall risk compared to a clinical risk assessment of the same self-reported risk factors. Clinicians could leverage key components of the FRP process as way to engage patients in risk reduction strategies earlier.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseRisk AssessmentRisk Reduction BehaviorAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth StatusHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedical History TakingMiddle AgedSelf Reportmixed methodsrisk perceptionrisk personalization processsaliencetype 2 diabetesvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID31646744
PMCPMC6978869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.