Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31646728›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).

Vadim Dukhanin, Scott Feeser, Scott A Berkowitz, Matthew DeCamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolution of a research team: the patient partner perspective.Research involvement and engagement · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vadim DukhaninDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8685-0027
Scott FeeserJohns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients, LLC (JMAP), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Scott A BerkowitzJohns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients, LLC (JMAP), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Matthew DeCampDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-8729

Funding

Patient-Centered Health Reform: Designing Engagement Interventions for ACOsK08HS023684 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DECAMP, MATTHEW WAYNE · 2014 to 2017
$606k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS023684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing attention to patient and family advisory councils (PFACs), what patients who are not PFAC members expect of PFACs remains understudied. Understanding their expectations is critical if PFACs are to help health systems achieve certain outcomes (eg increased patient satisfaction with health systems).

objectiveTo obtain rich insights about what patients who are not PFAC members expect of PFACs.

designFrom July to September 2018, we conducted a qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING AND

participantsWe recruited patients and caregivers who receive their care from the Johns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients (JMAP), LLC, a Medicare accountable care organization that in 2014 established a PFAC, the Beneficiary Advisory Council. APPROACH: Using grounded theory, we analysed field notes, analytic memos and transcripts to develop a theoretical model of patient engagement via PFACs.

resultsForty-two patients and caregivers participated in five focus groups that included individuals of different ages, races, health statuses and socio-economic statuses. Participants were largely unaware of PFACs. Participants wanted to know who represented them (interpreted as a form of political representation) and emphasized the need for representatives' diversity. Who mattered because who could affect what PFACs do. Participants expected that all patients should be able to communicate with PFACs and that meaningful engagement could enhance perceptions of health systems.

conclusionsEliciting views about patient representation from patients who have not been engaged as advisors or representatives has the potential to inform PFACs' activities. Attention should be given to improving and measuring patients' awareness of, and interactions with, their patient representatives.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesFamilyPatient AdvocacyPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFemaleFocus GroupsGrounded TheoryHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedQualitative Researchhealth systemsparticipationpatient engagementpublic involvementrepresentativeness

Identifiers

PMID31646728
PMCPMC6978862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.