Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31646618›Full record

ArticleChild development2019

Minds Under Siege: Cognitive Signatures of Poverty and Trauma in Refugee and Non-Refugee Adolescents.

Alexandra Chen, Catherine Panter-Brick, Kristin Hadfield, Rana Dajani, Amar Hamoudi, Margaret Sheridan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandra ChenHarvard University.
Catherine Panter-BrickYale University.
Kristin HadfieldQueen Mary University of London.ORCID 0000-0003-0234-0829
Rana DajaniHashemite University.
Amar HamoudiUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Margaret SheridanUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Harvard University Press · USHashemite University · JOQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USYale University · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impacts of war and displacement on executive function (EF)-what we might call the cognitive signatures of minds under siege-are little known. We surveyed a gender-balanced sample of 12- to 18-year-old Syrian refugees (n = 240) and Jordanian non-refugees (n = 210) living in Jordan. We examined the relative contributions of poverty, trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress, and insecurity to variance in inhibitory control and working memory. We observed associations between poverty and WM, suggesting that, even in populations exposed to substantial violence and fear, poverty is a specific pathway to WM deficit. We did not, however, find associations between EFs and exposures to trauma. Careful distinction between childhood adversities may illuminate which neurocognitive pathways matter for measures of cognitive function.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesExposure to ViolenceInhibition, PsychologicalPovertyRefugeesAdolescentChildCognitive DysfunctionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansJordanMaleMemory, Short-TermPsychological TraumaSyria

Identifiers

PMID31646618
PMCPMC6900191
OpenAlexW2981332062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.