ArticleHistology and histopathology2020
Reduced histologic neo in-stent restenosis after use of a paclitaxel-coated cutting balloon in porcine coronary arteries.
Article in Histology and histopathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has declined dramatically, but once it develops, no current treatment option, such as drug-eluting stents, drug-coated balloons, or cutting balloons (CBs), prevents re-narrowing of the stented atherosclerotic artery. In this preclinical study, we aimed to improve the efficacy of ISR treatment by coating CBs with paclitaxel (paclitaxel-eluting cutting balloon; PECB) and to characterize the histological features of neo-ISRs that arise after ISR treatment. ISR was induced by bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in coronary arteries in pigs. After one month of follow-up, the BMS-induced ISR was treated with either CB or PECB. After another month, we performed quantitative coronary angiography, explanted the treated arteries and assessed histopathological and histomorphometric parameters. In addition, we compared the histological features of neo-ISRs with pre-treatment ISRs. Injury, inflammation, fibrin deposition, and endothelialization scores were similar between the CB and PECB groups at one month after ISR treatment. Neointimal area (0.87±0.61 vs. 1.95±1.14 mm², p=0.02), mean neointimal thickness (0.40±0.39 vs. 0.99±0.56 mm, p=0.01), and percent area stenosis (27.3±20.4 vs. 48.3±22.9%, p=0.04) were decreased in PECB-treated coronary arteries compared to CB-treated arteries, respectively. Density of cells (predominantly smooth muscle cells; SMCs) was increased in neo-ISRs (3.51±3.05×10³ vs. 6.35±2.57×10³ cells/mm², p<0.01), but significantly more CD68⁺ and CD20⁺ cells were found in the pre-treatment ISRs. In conclusion, PECB treatment of ISRs led to better results in terms of smaller neointimal area and %area stenosis of the neo-ISR. SMC density was increased in neo-ISRs in contrast with higher percentage of CD68⁺ and CD20⁺ cells in pre-treatment ISRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.