Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31646462›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2019

Patient-clinician interactions and disparities in breast cancer care: the equality in breast cancer care study.

Felisa A Gonzales, Meera Sangaramoorthy, Laura A Dwyer, Salma Shariff-Marco, Amani M Allen, Allison W Kurian, Juan Yang, Michelle M Langer, Laura Allen, Bryce B Reeve and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Patient Characteristics Associated with Intended Nonguideline Chemotherapy in Women with Stage I to IIIA Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Incident Cardiovascular Disease Risk among Older Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Breast Cancer Survivors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Breast Cancer Disparities in Asian Women: The Need for Disaggregated Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Felisa A GonzalesDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, The Colorado Trust, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Meera SangaramoorthyDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Laura A DwyerCape Fox Facilities Services, Manassas, VA, USA.
Salma Shariff-MarcoDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Amani M AllenSchool of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Allison W KurianHealth Research & Policy (Epidemiology), School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Juan YangDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michelle M LangerDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Laura AllenDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bryce B ReeveCenter for Health Measurement, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Stephen H TaplinCenter for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Scarlett Lin GomezDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA. scarlett.gomez@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USBerkeley Public Health Division · USCenter for Global Health · USDuke University · USNational Cancer Institute · USNorthwestern University · USStanford University · USUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

CDC HHS 5NU58DP006344NCCDPHP CDC HHS NU58DP006344NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine whether interpersonal aspects of patient-clinician interactions, such as patient-perceived medical discrimination, clinician mistrust, and treatment decision-making contribute to racial/ethnic/educational disparities in breast cancer care.

methodsA telephone interview was administered to 542 Asian/Pacific Islander (API), Black, Hispanic, and White women identified through the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, ages 20 and older diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast cancer. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from logistic regression models that assessed associations between race/ethnicity/education, medical discrimination, clinician mistrust, and treatment decision-making with concordance to breast cancer treatment guidelines (guideline-concordant treatment) and perceived quality of care (pQoC).

resultsApproximately three-quarters of women received treatment that was guideline-concordant (76.6%) and reported that their breast cancer care was excellent (72.1%). Non-college-educated Black women had lower odds of guideline-concordant care (aOR (CI) = 0.29 (0.12-0.67)) vs. college-educated White women. Odds of excellent pQoC were lower among the following: college-educated Hispanic women (aOR (CI) = 0.09 (0.02-0.47)) and API women regardless of education (aORs ≤ 0.50) vs. college-educated White women, women reporting low and moderate levels of discrimination (aORs ≤ 0.44) vs. none, and women reporting any clinician mistrust (aOR (CI) = 0.50 (0.29-0.88)) vs. none. Disparities in guideline-concordant care and pQoC persisted after controlling for medical discrimination, clinician mistrust, and decision-making.

conclusionsInterpersonal aspects of the patient-clinician interaction had an impact on pQoC but not receipt of guideline-concordant treatment and did not explain disparities in either outcome. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Although breast cancer survivors' interpersonal interactions with clinicians did not influence receipt of appropriate treatment, intervention strategies to improve patient-clinician relations may help attenuate disparities in survivors' pQoC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of Health CareBreast cancerDecision-makingDiscriminationDisparitiesMistrust

Identifiers

PMID31646462
PMCPMC10187984
OpenAlexW2982141778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.