Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31646426›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2020

Retrospective Analysis of Cancer-Associated Myositis Patients over the Past 3 Decades in a Hungarian Myositis Cohort.

Csilla András, Levente Bodoki, Melinda Nagy-Vincze, Zoltán Griger, Emese Csiki, Katalin Dankó

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Malignancy in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Recent Insights.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Secondary Causes of Myositis.Current treatment options in neurology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Csilla AndrásFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Levente BodokiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. bodoki.levente@gmail.com.
Melinda Nagy-VinczeFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Zoltán GrigerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Emese CsikiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Katalin DankóFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
University of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Association between cancer and myositis has been extensively reported and malignancy is a potentially life-threating complication in myositis. In this retrospective study authors give an overview of Hungarian cancer-associated myositis (CAM) patients treated at a single centre managing 450 myositis patients. All patients were diagnosed according to Bohan and Peter. Statistical analysis of disease onset, age, sex, muscle, skin and extramuscular symptoms, muscle enzymes, presence of antibodies, treatment and prognosis was performed. 43 patients could be considered as having CAM. 83.72% had cancer within one year of diagnosis of myositis. Most common localizations were ductal carcinoma of breast and adenocarcinoma of lung. Significant differences were observed between CAM and the non-CAM control patients: DM:PM ratio was 2.31:1 vs. 0.87:1, respectively (p = 0.029), age at diagnosis was 56.60 ± 12.79 vs. 38.88 ± 10.88 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Tumour-treatment was the following: surgical removal in 55.81%, chemotherapy in 51.1%, radiotherapy in 39.53%, hormone treatment in 18.6%, combination therapy in 51.16% of patients. Muscle enzyme levels of patients undergoing surgery were significantly reduced after intervention. 36 patients died (83.72%); 25 DM (83.33%) and 11 PM patients (84.62%); 5 years survival was 15.4% for PM and 27.5% for DM. This study demonstrates that DM, distal muscle weakness, asymmetric Raynaud's phenomenon, older age, ANA-negativity are risk factors for developing malignancy and polymyositis patients have less chance of long-lasting survival. It is very important to think about cancer and follow every single myositis patient in the clinical routine because survival rate of CAM is very poor.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedMyositisNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesCancerCancer-associated myositis (CAM)Dermatomyositis (DM)Muscle weaknessPolymyositis (PM)

Identifiers

PMID31646426
PMCPMC7297838
OpenAlexW2982110516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.