Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31646186›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2019

The repurposing of type I-E CRISPR-Cascade for gene activation in plants.

Joshua K Young, Stephen L Gasior, Spencer Jones, Lijuan Wang, Pedro Navarro, Becca Vickroy, Rodolphe Barrangou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua K Young *Department of Molecular Engineering, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA 50131 USA.
Stephen L Gasior *Department of Molecular Engineering, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA 50131 USA.
Spencer JonesDepartment of Molecular Engineering, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA 50131 USA.
Lijuan WangDepartment of Molecular Engineering, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA 50131 USA.
Pedro NavarroDepartment of Molecular Engineering, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA 50131 USA.
Becca VickroyDepartment of Molecular Engineering, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA 50131 USA.
Rodolphe Barrangou2Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0648-3504
Corteva (United States) · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas systems are robust and facile tools for manipulating the genome, epigenome and transcriptome of eukaryotic organisms. Most groups use class 2 effectors, such as Cas9 and Cas12a, however, other CRISPR-Cas systems may provide unique opportunities for genome engineering. Indeed, the multi-subunit composition of class 1 systems offers to expand the number of domains and functionalities that may be recruited to a genomic target. Here we report DNA targeting in

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsBiolisticsChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantGenes, PlantGenetic EngineeringPlasmidsStreptococcus thermophilusTranscriptional ActivationZea maysDNA, PlantGene regulationGenetic engineeringPlant genetics

Identifiers

PMID31646186
PMCPMC6802105
OpenAlexW2980411075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.