What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Pharmaceutics · 2021
   Review
2. Analysis of Volatile Molecules Present in the Secretome of the Fungal PathogenMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
   Article
3. Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
   Review
4. First Isolation of Candida nivariensis, an Emerging Fungal Pathogen, in Kuwait.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
   Article
5. Antifungal Drug Repurposing.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as