Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31645890›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2019

The impact of cancer campaigns in Brazil: a Google Trends analysis.

Luiz Fernando Quintanilha, Laumar Neves Souza, Daniel Sanches, Rafael Senos Demarco, Kiyoshi Ferreira Fukutani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. What does Google Trends reveal about the proportion of waterpipe users in the Brazilian population?Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Does Pink October really impact breast cancer screening?Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luiz Fernando QuintanilhaUniversidade Salvador, Laureate Universities, Salvador 41770-235, Brazil.
Laumar Neves SouzaUniversidade Salvador, Laureate Universities, Salvador 41770-235, Brazil.
Daniel SanchesDivision of Arts and Sciences, South Florida State College, Avon Park, FL 33825, USA.
Rafael Senos DemarcoUniversity of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Kiyoshi Ferreira FukutaniCentro Universitário FTC, Faculdade de Medicina, Salvador 41741-590, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that more than 600,000 new cases of cancer will be reported in Brazil during the 2018-2019 biennium, especially with regard to prostate, breast, lung and colorectal cancers. Due to the high prevalence, incidence and mortality rates of these diseases, cancer campaigns such as 'Pink October' and 'Blue November' were strongly promoted in the past decade throughout the country to raise awareness of breast and prostate cancer, respectively. Nevertheless, whether the implementation of these campaigns has been proven efficient is still unknown. In the present study, we analysed the effectiveness of these campaigns on eliciting population online interest for cancer information. The Google Trends database was evaluated for the relative Internet search popularity for the terms 'breast cancer' and 'prostate cancer' from 2014 to 2019. Aside from some regional differences, we found that there was a high demand for 'breast cancer' and, to a lesser extent, 'prostate cancer' searches in a seasonal fashion (during October and November, respectively). Despite the worldwide high incidence of lung and colorectal cancers, searches including these keywords did not show increases in any specific period of the year, demonstrating the efficiency of the 'Pink October' and 'Blue November' campaigns in engaging the interest of the Brazilian population on the subject. These results allow us to infer that campaigns are effective in mobilising the attention of the Brazilian population with regard to breast and prostate cancers, but the practical aspects in reducing incidence and mortality should still be discussed.

Indexed as

breast neoplasmshealth promotionnational health programmesneoplasmsprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31645890
PMCPMC6786828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.