Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31645765›Full record

ArticleNature2019

Pan-cancer whole-genome analyses of metastatic solid tumours.

Peter Priestley, Jonathan Baber, Martijn P Lolkema, Neeltje Steeghs, Ewart de Bruijn, Charles Shale, Korneel Duyvesteyn, Susan Haidari, Arne van Hoeck, Wendy Onstenk and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04981119 (An Observational Study Obtaining Solid Tumor Tissue From Participants and Apheresis for CAR T-Cell Therapy Manufacturing), which is not on this map. Cited by 688 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
688citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
45.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04981119 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

An Observational Study Obtaining Solid Tumor Tissue From Participants and Apheresis for CAR T-Cell Therapy Manufacturing

TypeobservationalSponsorA2 Biotherapeutics Inc.Ran2021 to 2029Enrolled200ConditionsSolid Tumor, Adult, Colorectal Cancer, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Pancreatic CancerArmsApheresis, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), Long Range NGS HLA typing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

688 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. FFPE-CUTAC: A Single Assay, Multiple Layers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. RHAMM drives formation of polyploid cancer cells and confers resistance to ER-targeted therapy in breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

628 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Peter Priestley *Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonathan Baber *Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn P LolkemaCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Neeltje SteeghsCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewart de BruijnHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles ShaleHartwig Medical Foundation Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Korneel DuyvesteynHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susan HaidariHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arne van HoeckCenter for Molecular Medicine and Oncode Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wendy OnstenkHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul RoepmanHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mircea VodaHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Haiko J BloemendalMeander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Vivianne C G Tjan-HeijnenMaastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Carla M L van HerpenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mariette LabotsVU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petronella O WitteveenCancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Egbert F SmitCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefan SleijferCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Emile E VoestCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Edwin CuppenHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.cuppen@hartwigmedicalfoundation.nl.
Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment · NLHartwig Medical Foundation · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLMaastricht University · NLOncode Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic cancer is a major cause of death and is associated with poor treatment efficacy. A better understanding of the characteristics of late-stage cancer is required to help adapt personalized treatments, reduce overtreatment and improve outcomes. Here we describe the largest, to our knowledge, pan-cancer study of metastatic solid tumour genomes, including whole-genome sequencing data for 2,520 pairs of tumour and normal tissue, analysed at median depths of 106× and 38×, respectively, and surveying more than 70 million somatic variants. The characteristic mutations of metastatic lesions varied widely, with mutations that reflect those of the primary tumour types, and with high rates of whole-genome duplication events (56%). Individual metastatic lesions were relatively homogeneous, with the vast majority (96%) of driver mutations being clonal and up to 80% of tumour-suppressor genes being inactivated bi-allelically by different mutational mechanisms. Although metastatic tumour genomes showed similar mutational landscape and driver genes to primary tumours, we find characteristics that could contribute to responsiveness to therapy or resistance in individual patients. We implement an approach for the review of clinically relevant associations and their potential for actionability. For 62% of patients, we identify genetic variants that may be used to stratify patients towards therapies that either have been approved or are in clinical trials. This demonstrates the importance of comprehensive genomic tumour profiling for precision medicine in cancer.

Indexed as

MutationPrecision MedicineWhole Genome SequencingClone CellsDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansINDEL MutationInformation DisseminationMaleNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31645765
PMCPMC6872491
OpenAlexW2981548686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.