Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31645638›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2020

Rapid treatment of moderate to severe hypertension using a novel protocol in a single-centre, before and after interventional study.

Andrew N Jordan, Christine Anning, Lindsay Wilkes, Claire Ball, Nicola Pamphilon, Christopher E Clark, Nicholas G Bellenger, Angela C Shore, Andrew S P Sharp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Group-delivered interventions for lowering blood pressure in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Morphological and functional cardiac consequences of rapid hypertension treatment: a cohort study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew N JordanNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, Exeter, UK.
Christine AnningNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, Exeter, UK.
Lindsay WilkesNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, Exeter, UK.
Claire BallNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, Exeter, UK.
Nicola PamphilonNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, Exeter, UK.
Christopher E ClarkPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Smeall Building, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2 LU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7526-3038
Nicholas G BellengerInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5AX, UK.
Angela C ShoreNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, Vascular Medicine, Exeter, UK.
Andrew S P SharpInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5AX, UK. drandrewsharp@gmail.com.
University of Exeter · GBNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid treatment to target in hypertension may have beneficial effects on long-term outcomes. This has led to a new recommendation in the 2018 European hypertension guidelines for patients with grade II/III hypertension to be treated to target within three months. However, whether it is feasible and safe to quickly manage treatment-naïve grade II/III hypertension to target was unclear. We examined this using a single-centre before and after interventional study, treating newly diagnosed, never-treated, grade II/III hypertensive patients with a daytime average systolic ABP ≥ 150 mmHg to target within 18 weeks. The proportion at office target BP at 18 weeks was determined, together with office and ambulatory BP change from baseline to after the intervention. The protocol was designed to maximise medication adherence, including a low threshold for treatment adaptation. Safety was evaluated through close monitoring of adverse events and protocol discontinuation. Fifty-five participants were enrolled with 54 completing the protocol. 69 ± 12.3% were at office target BP at their final visit, despite a high average starting BP of 175/103 mmHg, as a consequence of significant reductions in both office and ambulatory BP. Of those at office target BP, 51% were above target on ambulatory measurement. Adherence testing demonstrated that 92% of participants were adherent to treatment at their final visit. Therefore we conclude that the accelerated management of treatment-naïve grade II/III hypertension is feasible and safe to implement in routine practice and there is no evidence to suggest it causes harm. Further large-scale randomised studies of rapid, adaptive treatment, including a cost-effectiveness analysis, are required.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansMedication AdherenceAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID31645638
OpenAlexW2981908053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.