Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31645608›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Co-inoculation effect of Rhizobium and Achillea millefolium L. oil extracts on growth of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and soil microbial-chemical properties.

Veysel Turan, Peter Schröder, Serdar Bilen, Heribert Insam, Marina Fernández-Delgado Juárez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
29.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 199 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Post-harvest biology and recent advances of storage technologies in sugarcane.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Isolation and characterization ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Veysel TuranInstitute of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. vturan@bingol.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-8411
Peter SchröderDepartment of Microbe-Plant Interactions, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH Neuherberg, Oberschleißheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7042-8094
Serdar BilenDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-1893
Heribert InsamInstitute of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5136-2752
Marina Fernández-Delgado JuárezInstitute of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-6906
Universität Innsbruck · ATAtatürk University · TRBingöl University · TRHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential oils (EO) of several plant species have the potential to combat plant and fungal diseases. However, the effects of Achillea millefolium EO on the development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), is still unknown. Moreover, its effect on N

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAchilleaAnalysis of VarianceOils, VolatilePhaseolusPlant ExtractsRhizobiumSoilOils, VolatilePlant ExtractsSoil

Identifiers

PMID31645608
PMCPMC6811525
OpenAlexW2981723109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.