ArticleEvidence-based mental health2020
Personalise antidepressant treatment for unipolar depression combining individual choices, risks and big data (PETRUSHKA): rationale and protocol.
Article in Evidence-based mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Gabapentin and pregabalin in bipolar disorder, anxiety states, and insomnia: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and rationale.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: Meta-Review of Efficacy, Tolerability and Suicidality in Acute Treatment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Multimodal neuroimaging and AI integration in cognitive disorders: advances, challenges, and future directions for precision medicine.Psychoradiology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Constructs of Major Depression in DSM-5: Current Critiques and Future Directions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Advancing the evidence base for child and adolescent psychopharmacology.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
- An online evidence-based dictionary of common adverse events of antidepressants: a new tool to empower patients and clinicians in their shared decision-making process.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Optimising the use of electronic medical records for large scale research in psychiatry.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Digital Mental Health for Schizophrenia and Other Severe Mental Illnesses: An International Consensus on Current Challenges and Potential Solutions.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Review
- Harnessing the potential of machine learning and artificial intelligence for dementia research.Brain informatics · 2023Review
- Important adverse events to be evaluated in antidepressant trials and meta-analyses in depression: a large international preference study including patients and healthcare professionals.Evidence-based mental health · 2022Article
- Individualized antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder: Novel evidence-informed decision support tool.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Review
- Article
- Conceptualising fairness: three pillars for medical algorithms and health equity.BMJ health & care informatics · 2022Review
- Critiquing the Critique: Resisting Commonplace Criticisms of Antidepressants in Online Platforms.Qualitative health research · 2021Article
- Treatment selection using prototyping in latent-space with application to depression treatment.PloS one · 2021Article
- Real-world effect of antidepressants for depressive disorder in primary care: protocol of a population-based cohort study.Evidence-based mental health · 2020Article
- Efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for non-specific chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMatching treatment to specific patients is too often a matter of trial and error, while treatment efficacy should be optimised by limiting risks and costs and by incorporating patients' preferences. Factors influencing an individual's drug response in major depressive disorder may include a number of clinical variables (such as previous treatments, severity of illness, concomitant anxiety etc) as well demographics (for instance, age, weight, social support and family history). Our project, funded by the National Institute of Health Research, is aimed at developing and subsequently testing a precision medicine approach to the pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder in adults, which can be used in everyday clinical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will jointly synthesise data from patients with major depressive disorder, obtained from diverse datasets, including randomised trials as well as observational, real-world studies. We will summarise the highest quality and most up-to-date scientific evidence about comparative effectiveness and tolerability (adverse effects) of antidepressants for major depressive disorder, develop and externally validate prediction models to produce stratified treatment recommendations. Results from this analysis will subsequently inform a web-based platform and build a decision support tool combining the stratified recommendations with clinicians and patients' preferences, to adapt the tool, increase its' reliability and tailor treatment indications to the individual-patient level. We will then test whether use of the tool relative to treatment as usual in real-world clinical settings leads to enhanced treatment adherence and response, is acceptable to clinicians and patients, and is economically viable in the UK National Health Service. DISCUSSION: This is a clinically oriented study, coordinated by an international team of experts, with important implications for patients treated in real-world setting. This project will form a test-case that, if effective, will be extended to non-pharmacological treatments (either face-to-face or internet-delivered), to other populations and disorders in psychiatry (for instance, children and adolescents, or schizophrenia and treatment-resistant depression) and to other fields of medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.