Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31645364›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based mental health2020

Personalise antidepressant treatment for unipolar depression combining individual choices, risks and big data (PETRUSHKA): rationale and protocol.

Anneka Tomlinson, Toshi A Furukawa, Orestis Efthimiou, Georgia Salanti, Franco De Crescenzo, Ilina Singh, Andrea Cipriani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anneka TomlinsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Toshi A FurukawaGraduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Orestis EfthimiouInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-7572
Georgia SalantiInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Franco De CrescenzoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ilina SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK andrea.cipriani@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5179-8321

Funding

Department of Health RP-2017-08-ST2-006Medical Research Council MC_PC_17215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMatching treatment to specific patients is too often a matter of trial and error, while treatment efficacy should be optimised by limiting risks and costs and by incorporating patients' preferences. Factors influencing an individual's drug response in major depressive disorder may include a number of clinical variables (such as previous treatments, severity of illness, concomitant anxiety etc) as well demographics (for instance, age, weight, social support and family history). Our project, funded by the National Institute of Health Research, is aimed at developing and subsequently testing a precision medicine approach to the pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder in adults, which can be used in everyday clinical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will jointly synthesise data from patients with major depressive disorder, obtained from diverse datasets, including randomised trials as well as observational, real-world studies. We will summarise the highest quality and most up-to-date scientific evidence about comparative effectiveness and tolerability (adverse effects) of antidepressants for major depressive disorder, develop and externally validate prediction models to produce stratified treatment recommendations. Results from this analysis will subsequently inform a web-based platform and build a decision support tool combining the stratified recommendations with clinicians and patients' preferences, to adapt the tool, increase its' reliability and tailor treatment indications to the individual-patient level. We will then test whether use of the tool relative to treatment as usual in real-world clinical settings leads to enhanced treatment adherence and response, is acceptable to clinicians and patients, and is economically viable in the UK National Health Service. DISCUSSION: This is a clinically oriented study, coordinated by an international team of experts, with important implications for patients treated in real-world setting. This project will form a test-case that, if effective, will be extended to non-pharmacological treatments (either face-to-face or internet-delivered), to other populations and disorders in psychiatry (for instance, children and adolescents, or schizophrenia and treatment-resistant depression) and to other fields of medicine.

Indexed as

Clinical Studies as TopicDecision Support TechniquesAdultAntidepressive AgentsDatasets as TopicHumansMajor Depressive DisorderPrecision MedicineAntidepressive Agentsadult psychiatrydepression and mood disorders

Identifiers

PMID31645364
PMCPMC7229905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.